leaky_shower_thought

yes. no doubt their work is recognized and appreciated by everyone in their company.

CEOs watching numbers go brrrr === working~!

Like all other people, I believe he should lead by example so others can easily follow his work.

good set of questions while trying to be non biased on certain topics.

for me, topics about privacy and misinformation matter more than ai. i would like them to lean more on helping me identify ai generated text and deepfakes as far as ai is concerned.

i also liked that mozilla study about smart cars so more of that is nice.

95% chance they will serve themselves and not the public for sure.

BG3 exec-bro played it well with the words.

truly knows what it wants to be could mean different things depends on how you spin it.

Most people prefer more fps over image quality, so minor artifacting from DLSS is preferable to the game running much slower with cleaner image quality.

I don't think we're not much different in this portion. AI upscale is passable enough that gamers will choose it. If presented with a better, non-artifacting option, gamers will choose that since the goal is performance and not AI. If the stat is from PS data, and not from a poll, I think it just strengthens that users want performance more.

There will never be a set performance target again.

It's not that there's no set performance target. The difference is merely one, on the CounterStrike era, vs. many, now. Now, there's more performance targets for PC than Counter Strike days. Games just can't keep up. Saying "there will never be a set performance target" is just washing hands when a publishers/ directors won't set directions and priorities which performance point to prioritize.

It might be that your point is optimizing for scalability, and that is fine too.

the premise seems flawed, i think.

i feel what he's saying is: we suck optimizing gfx performance now because gamers deem ai upscale quality as passable

this feels opposite to what the ps poll says that gamers enable performance mode more because the priority is more stable frames than shiny anti aliasing/post processing.

she's not selling bibles or nfts or pardons.

this will be a good show.

I think he already got pay-to-search and AI-infiltrated subreddits.

He's just trying new combos.

republican judges are probably okay with the bribe/ gratuity as long as they checks 10 commandments "do not bear false witness" about it.

🤡 marvelous

the guy always lies. so my initial tendency is always say yes.

the only difference here is time. it is pre covfefe time so the lies must still be bigly uncredible. he's got lots of teen pageants to go to before another session with his bruh epstein.