limelight79

My "dream" car is a V6 Accord from the last year they made them, which I think is 2016. I'd buy one of those right now and just keep repairing it, and hope no one t-bones me. Unfortunately I think my wife is still in the mindset of "we should buy a new car and keep it forever", which used to be my mindset, too. But she's not seeing the news on this stuff like I am, either. I suspect if I explained "heated seat subscription" to her (a feature she will not buy a car without) she would object strenuously.

But I don't like where new cars are going, at all. I don't like subscriptions, I don't like the backseat driver nanny features that blare out false alarms, and on the whole I'd rather not have adaptive cruise control (there are times when adaptive cruise is nice, but overall I prefer the old-style cruise control).

We have a 2020 Mazda that I absolutely hate driving; if that is the future of cars, I'm not interested.

I'm hoping my car and our pickup last forever. The other day we took the Mazda for an errand in poor weather because, as I said, "It's the most expendable car."

Yeah for connected features, there are those costs. A vehicle we own would let me remote start it and lock and unlock doors from the app...if I paid $15/month. It's not worth it to me, so I've never paid for that service, and the vehicle works fine without it. I mostly even forget it exists. I might be more interested if it would report things like fuel level, oil and fuel filter replacement time, and so on, but it doesn't (but even then I'm not sure it'd be worth $15/month).

A subscription for heated seats, though? No. I don't want a subscription service for something that doesn't have an ongoing cost to the manufacturer. For us in particular, we buy our cars with the intention of keeping them a long time, and I'm not paying that fee for the life of the car. I like cars that are paid off.

If I'm on a heated seat subscription and they break for some reason, who pays for them to be fixed?

Comparison on the heated seats repair question: I rent the water softener at my house for $29/month. (The previous owner set it up, and I haven't gotten around to replacing it...it's a "it's working, and I have bigger issues" situation.) At this point I've paid for two of the highest-end home water softeners available, and I haven't had a single issue with the one I have, so it's definitely not the best setup financially. But, if my water softener dies today, I can call them, and they'll come right out and fix it or replace it, no charge. So there is a benefit to that monthly subscription price; they take the risk of it failing, not me.

Well I do have some gray hairs, so no issue there...

Hmm interesting point, thanks. That's the sort of thing I might not have noticed since I don't use it on an interactive system like my desktop.

Yeah it seems to work very well on my server. I've always just wondered why I don't see more people recommending it when they're switching from Ubuntu/Kubuntu. From what I've seen on the server (which I mostly access remotely), it seems decent.

Thanks. I often wonder why I don't see people recommending Debian as a potential destination from Ubuntu/Kubuntu. Why not go to the Free source?

I run Kubuntu on my desktop and laptop machines but I'm seriously considering switching to Debian (which I run on my server). Any reason I wouldn't want to do that on my desktop or laptop?

(Previously I ran Slackware on everything, so both of them feel like gliding softly on a cloud to me.)

I've moderated many online forums going waaaay back (farther than I'd like to admit actually). I agree with you, and I want to explain decisions to the users too, so I'll generally try to talk them as well. And sometimes we get a connection, and sometimes I realize I made a mistake. But in my experience, when they start playing lawyer, you're not going to please them.

I never thought about the four categories of mods before, but what you wrote feels pretty accurate. I think I'm in that first group, and I try to avoid issues by moderating as lightly as possible.

When I'm in other groups or communities, sometimes I think, "If someone did that in my group, they'd get one warning, then I'd just ban them the second time it happened. Boom. End of discussion." But I know that's likely not how it would go in reality. LOL

The "legal eagles" are best ignored. Just ignore them. Most of the time they'll just stop if you ignore them, because they want you to argue with them.

They claim the system is inefficient and a US model would be better.

Oh god. These people must be stopped. And I say that as a USA citizen that actually has excellent health care.

ESPN's app doesn't note when a player is missing off the bench or something like that. The reporters at the game notice it and X it out.

It was extremely useful in sports for quick in-game updates, especially from third-party groups (like the news beat reporters, versus getting info from the team).

It's really entrenched, though: Even with all of the chaos and controversy, it's hard to find articles that reference something that happened in a game that don't embed some tweets (or whatever they hell they're called now) for the video. It's extremely frustrating. I think, in part, that's why the hockey community here on lemmy isn't taking off - no one wants to link to Twitter, and there are basically no other sources.