The other benefit of being in highschool is many people have loads of time to spend.
I honestly don't know if there is any advice I can give to someone with a fulltime job and care giving responsibilities that would be convincing.
The other benefit of being in highschool is many people have loads of time to spend.
I honestly don't know if there is any advice I can give to someone with a fulltime job and care giving responsibilities that would be convincing.
No I'm one of those "think!" nutjobs
We're trying to have an intelligent discussion here.
You think every Lemmy admin should be forced to fed with CSAM instances, and therefor host on their own servers CSAM? Wow great plan you have for expanding the fediverse.
It would be solved for people who are primarily interested in tech and gaming. How about bellow challenges?
Gaming is huge so presumably lots of gamers are interested in the wider world, which is not exactly well represented here compared to the major platforms.
And we can't ignore the inherent complexities of federation. If a user signs up to another instance but for some reason that instance (or game 's instance) is blocked by others or even goes offline, then it will be confusing if not ruining of their experience.
In another subthread I came up with the below, is this what you mean? I haven't tried it yet.
/home/user/folderApple
is always empty/home/user/folderApple-original
mounts ontop of /home/user/folderApple
at boot/mnt/drive/folderBanana
also mounts ontop of /home/user/folderApple
when/if it becomes available (later in the order)Ideally I'd like to avoid a script because my experience is they aren't very durable. I make mistakes and they are difficult to troubleshoot. So I am trying to just use the tools that are already available in the system.
But maybe there is something in the idea of using a second mount, like if
/home/user/folderApple
is always empty/home/user/folderApple-original
mounts ontop of /home/user/folderApple
at boot/mnt/drive/folderBanana
also mounts ontop of /home/user/folderApple
when/if it becomes available (later in the order)The results are the same no matter which order I do the mounts in.
don't delete your post, people wrote things here.
You can tell hugo to build from an arbitrary directory of markdown in the config file. Then it'll just do it's best. I have done this experimentally on completely un-optimized obsidian vaults for just my own local use. IIRC there are some mandatory frontmatter elements that hugo requires (date, draft status, and/or title? consult the docs) which will prevent a file from appearing at all if they are missing. Depending how vigilant you are with that kind of thing you can get a more or less janky site straight away.
There are also some plugins, bash scripts etc around that will assist in this. In tidying up the files, selecting which ones to publish, mirroring to another directory etc. I have had mixed success personally, but my vaults are sprawling, badly organized and the frontmatter is often a mess which is all on me. Someone who is less/differently negligent would have different luck. I can provide some links to relevant projects if anyone is interested.
For nonidentical devices you create additional packages prefixed with specific device name. You don’t need to link all packages at once with stow, pass a name of a package to link it alone.uuu
Sooo... I find some way to share the dotfiles
directory across devices (rsync, syncthing, git, nextcloud, DAV) then make specific subdirs like this?:
~
- dotfiles
- bash-desktop
dot-bashrc
dot-bash_profile
- bash-laptop
dot-bashrc
dot-profile
dot-bash_profile
But what is the software doing for me? I'm manually moving all these files and putting them together in the specific way requested. Setting the whole thing up is most of the work. Anyone who can write a script to create the structure can just as easily write it to make symlinks. I'm sure I'm missing something here.
yadm is the one I liked the best and tried it a few times. fact is that I am unlikely to keep a repo like this even part way up to date. New files are created all the time and not added, old ones don't get updated or removed. There's not even a good way to notice in any file manager what is included and what's not as far as I know. yadm doesn't work with tools like eza which can display the git status of files in repos. (and it probably wouldn't be feasible.)
Plus I have some specific config collections already in change tracking and it makes more sense to keep it that way. Having so many unrelated files together in one project is too chaotic and distracting.
It's not realistic for me to manage merges, modules, cherry picking, branches all that for so many files that change constantly without direct intervention. Quickly enough git will tie itself into some knot and I won't be able to pick it apart.
I've not used Guix but I don't think any distro has anything close to number of desirable available packages as arch--- so be prepared for that. My ventures into debian, suse and fedora were made quite annoying by having to work around the many missing packages. Including user-facing applications, dependencies and background programs. I never quite got down with distrobox, maybe that's the cure.
this chart on wikipedia gives the impression that Debian has more packages but that's not the way it feels when you are looking for something. Maybe they have a lot of dot matrix printer libraries from 1992 or something which bring the number up.
Arch includes a lot of not-at-all-free packages (which it is impossible to distinguish in pacman or other tool as far as I can find), orphaned, new packages that haven't yet made it into other repos, and packages where no attempt has been made to submit them to other repos.
On arch I have virtually never had to go outside the repos for packages. It's very hard to give up once you are used to it. (Even though it's better to use properly libre/free stuff and other benefits of a more curated approach like security, stability and quality.)