Browser profiles serve very different needs from OS level accounts.
lolcatnip
That's great for sites you visit routinely but way more hassle than it's worth for one-off visits.
You're reading a lot into that person's comment that isn't there.
Consumers and their own employees.
Calling anyone who's ever had a psychedelic experience a "druggie" is extremely judgemental. Unlike crystals, the point of psychedelics is the experience itself, and I can assure you it's very real. But that makes me a "druggie" right? Seems like you think the only people qualified to comment on psychedelic experiences are the ones who know nothing about them because they've never had one.
Whooooosh.
They're describing how something felt, not something that "actually" happened. Who are you to say they didn't feel that way?
You know you can say fuck on Reddit, right?
Sometimes it works well as a stylistic choice. It's not pretending not to use a bad word, but rather drawing attention to the fact that you're deliberately being a little bit naughty with a wink to the reader. It's like the absurdity of what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps.
Ok fair enough. It's just surprising to see someone say that. The standard-issue dev machine where I work is a laptop with 32 GB.
Dude, that's how much RAM I used to have on a super high-end dev box at work with 56 cores. It was very helpful for compiling Chrome. WTF are you doing with a personal machine that needs that much RAM?
The joke is making fun of anyone who does assume incognito mode is hiding anything from third parties.
All the Chrome bashing around this issue is pathetic. Every major browser has the same feature and none that I know of give it a name that makes the purpose any more clear. It's obvious a lot of people have an irrational hatred of Chrome and don't understand the actual issues involved.