lolcatnip

joined 1 year ago
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 6 points 10 months ago (4 children)

You're describing the difference between the original Luddism that's against exploitation and the degenerate form that's just a blind hatred of new technology. Unfortunately there seems to be a lot of the latter on Lemmy.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Copyright law is mostly bullshit, though.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago

So is a local newspaper supposed to be afraid of not complying aggressively enough with foreign laws from the whole world, or just the EU? The way I see it they're already doing more than is reasonably required by making a good faith effort to prevent people in the EU from accessing their site. Holding them responsible for people who deliberately bypass the blocking seems downright imperialist to me.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

What exactly is the EU gonna do about a foreign site that does no business in the EU? They don't rule the world.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago (5 children)

One example I know if is my hometown newspaper, dentonrc.com; I have a friend who moved to Europe and was annoyed that they geo-blocked him, but I can't really blame them. How many people are really gonna visit the site for a small American newspaper from the EU? From a business perspective it makes no sense for them to pay a developer to do more than the bare minimum.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 23 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I don't feel the need to get a case that would allow my phone to survive an incident that I wouldn't survive.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You people should've stayed on Reddit.

That's a bingo!

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Does that mean you're Japanese, or that you're going to become Japanese?

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I don't think things like names of suspects or victims should be made public.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 6 points 10 months ago

That's still a new key for some people. My laptop doesn't have a context key, for example.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago

Ok, I think I see where our disagreement is. Would you agree that an encrypted broadcast is ok if you encrypt the sensitive information with a key that is only accessible to the specific individuals who need it? Not that I see any advantage to doing so—it's just a hypothetical scenario.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Killing 3rd party cookies is good, but doing it in a way that drives business to Google Ad Services seems like a textbook case of anticompetitive behavior to me. I wonder what makes them think they can get away with it. Or maybe they don't think they can but they're grasping at straws to keep their money printing machine operational.

view more: ‹ prev next ›