loonsun

Depends on the context, there is a lot of work in the scientific methods community trying to use NLP to augment traditionally fully human processes such as thematic analysis and systematic literature reviews and you can have protocols for validation there without 100% human review

It's about Agents, which implies multi step as those are meant to execute a series of tasks opposed to studies looking at base LLM model performance.

The famous tragedy of the commons essay was written by a eugenicist to spread propaganda

I feel attacked, I'm doing my best 😭

Thus the practice of drag was born

Nah, you should keep posting and people who come at people like they stabbed their mother's should take a break to touch grass

Mais il est juste l'évidence de ton point

It's a play on words joke

I'm surprised more user friendly distros don't have this, especially more commercial ones

So I'm a researcher in the field of Organizational Psychology so I have mostly insight on the "leadership part" as opposed to their experience mostly in Human Computer Interface. They aren't wrong here but the study they conducted seems very basic as well. It's good that it's an actual lab experiment but I wouldn't say it has much generalizablilty to an actual working environment. I'd say they would need to redo the study with conditions of trust building as they are really only indicating that humans are predesposed to make connections with other humans and be able to work with them, which we already know.

As a Canadian I'm very confused by this guy, I think he might have brain damage

A recent example is Owlcat's Rouge Trader. Full game on release, season pass is just a bundle of their two big expansion DLCs which offer full story additions and party members. Season passes work when they are lower cost bundles of high quality DLC, they are awful when they are incoherent slapped together offerings of cosmetics, random content, and stuff which should be base game.