masterspace

joined 1 year ago
[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

What the fuck do you guys think factories do? Just run for no reason? Where do you think the stuff you own, use, and consume comes from?

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

You also use Gmail and force Google to run their servers to power it.

Reducing your carbon footprint as much as possible is important, but it's absurd to get mad at companies that power 90% of the world's businesses for using a bunch of power to do so. It takes power to do those things. Get mad at the companies who are over consuming relative to their peers and those that are driving demand towards unattainable activities. Just getting mad at people for moving and using energy is absurd.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

They only do that because they project it to be profitable, i.e. they project demand for it.

It's also ridiculous to claim that people don't want it just because you don't.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago (5 children)

No, it's not.

Them making money implies that they are being paid to use power, which is true. Their absolute carbon footprint is irrelevant given that most of what the carbon they use is at the request of someone else. The metric to judge them on is their carbon footprint relevant to peers.

I.e. it's not fair to judge a cab company for driving someone somewhere (judge the person choosing to hire a cab), but it is fair to judge them if they use gas guzzlers instead of EVs.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It makes more sense than trying to build Master Chiefs. Robot powered body armour sounds awesome, but in reality it's a lot more efficient to avoid getting hit then to try and take hits and keep moving, especially if you're a rich country with an advantage in micropocessing resources (assuming Taiwan doesn't fall).

What they're talking about isn't crazy either, build out a platform that can handle robust military comms, connect it to a modern military information network, and then have local machine learning capabilities to handle local on site applications.

I mean, even just a bunch of soldiers in a line with networked helmets would create a line array of microphones that could theoretically be used to figure out where enemy fire is coming from / how many people are shooting at them, what type of gun is firing at them, how much they have left, etc. If humans today can pick out where a sniper might be shooting them from, Im willing to bet a computer connected to an array of different soldiers' sensors will be able to do it not too long for now.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

Lmao, the dumb capitalist corpo thinks Marxists are motivated by payment.

Learn how to think before you type.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The problem with copyright has nothing to do with terms limits. Those exacerbate the problem, but the fundamental problem with copyright and IP law is that it is a system of artificial scarcity where there is no need for one.

Rather than reward creators when their information is used, we hamfistedly try and prevent others from using that information so that people have to pay them to use it sometimes.

Capitalism is flat out the wrong system for distributing digital information, because as soon as information is digitized it is effectively infinitely abundant which sends its value to $0.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago

You realize that half of Lemmy is tying themselves in inconsistent logical knots trying to escape the reverse conundrum?

Copying isn't stealing and never was. Our IP system that artificially restricts information has never made sense in the digital age, and yet now everyone is on here cheering copyright on.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In that I can take a picture of them and you wouldn't notice or be impacted by it?

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Man this is fucking asinine. No one hates you. Certainly not the actual researchers and engineers building these products.

Capitalism fucks over everyone who's not immediately useful. AI is just modelling algorithms after neurons and discovering that that lets us solve a whole new class of fuzzy pattern matching problems.

The two of them together promises to fuck us over even more because that was one of the main things that we used to be better than computers at, but the solution is not remove the new technology from the equation, it's to remove the old and broken system of resource allocation that has and continues to fuck us no matter what.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You're describing how human beings learn and create.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago

No. It's only illegal if you republish what you scrape. Absolutely nothing prevents any company from scraping the web and using that information internally.

view more: ‹ prev next ›