masterspace

joined 2 years ago
[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

That's not an excuse to have a false and misleading headline.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What's your gripe with more than three windows?

Window management is usually not a complaint of Windows...

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

No, Krafton's explanation was clearer and plainer spoken.

Krafton may be lying or misrepresenting the situation, but their explanation is both simple and believable, if not necessarily the truth.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Yeah, this author is the pop-sci / sci-fi media writer on Ars Technica, not one of the actual science coverage ones that stick to their area of expertise, and you can tell by the overly broad, click bait, headline, that is not actually supported by the research at hand.

The actual research is using limited LLM agents and only explores an incredibly limited number of interventions. This research does not remotely come close to supporting the question of whether or not social media can be fixed, which in itself is a different question from harm reduction.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

I mean, no you don't given that they're being used in virtually every call centre and help desk these days.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The GDPR is good and has absolutely changed how things are done. I've been involved with multiple companies having to change their European data practices because of it.

I don't know why you have so little faith in the EU when it's an actually functioning government that is passing new consumer protection legislation.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

The problem with Brexit not the lack of clarity, it was that it was a fundamentally dumb idea motivated but dumbness.

It was a bunch of people who blamed every problem on the EU for no sound reason and thus they supported a self harming policy.

This is a situation where the policy is fundamentally sound, it just needs some clarity around implementation details. This is literally how government is supposed to work.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (5 children)

The way we bought it just requires the server code to be available to run, if does not require any specific company running servers. And running servers is not a suable offense.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

Yeah, the three fired heads owned 90% of the shares, so they got $225M from the initial sale, and were due to get another $225M from the bonuses. That's why Krafton still paid out $25M in bonuses after the uproar.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I mean their codebase more generally.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Krafton has claimed they asked for 30% more content for the early access version, which isn't that minimal.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Subnautica isn't just a survival game, but a story driven game as well, and given how janky their engine was, it's not a surprise that they'd want to overhaul it from the ground up.

view more: ‹ prev next ›