mctoasterson

joined 1 year ago
[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 38 points 2 months ago

POV you are walking down the street when you clip through the sidewalk and find yourself in the Backrooms.

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You do have to get an invite, seed, and maybe toss them a small crypto donation occasionally. The ratio thing depends on the tracker but usually it's just a requirement to seed back anything for at least a week. Popular torrents become FreeLeech and they don't count against your ratio.

Because the participants are all vetted, you don't get RIAA and MPAA shills in swarm trying to vacuum up IPs to start sending nasty legal letters out.

A decade ago when I used public torrents I remember getting those stupid ISP strikes. I know shit-tier regional ISPs would even try to embarrass you with the content you pirated. They'd send you a letter like "the Copyright holder for 'Anal Hookers of Beijing' told us they're big mad at you, and if you do it again you'll get your service revoked". Some of these ISPs were integrated with cable companies so they'd freeze your internet and cable, and display the text of the copyright strike on your fucking TV for your girlfriend or grandma to see.

Fuck that noise.

Since using a private tracker I have never received a single cease and desist or ISP warning letter. Then again, I only use Bit Torrent to download Linux ISOs.

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 21 points 2 months ago (10 children)

Private Trackers are the way forward.

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 1 points 2 months ago

I'm house Ryobi. I realize Ryobi is probably Hufflepuff (the "lame but at least not evil" one) in this scenario but so be it.

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 1 points 2 months ago

Funny. But the Trump impersonation sounds and looks more like Regis Philbin.

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 1 points 3 months ago

I think they should have included "ad free YouTube" as a perk for their YouTube TV service, which I had for a short while. Instead they wanted you to pay an extra subscription cost for YouTube Premium to get rid of ads.

The dark pattern game they play with the "skip" options and the increasing amount and random placement of ads is really offputting.

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

On the one hand I understand they aren't serving billions of hours of video for their own health. Not sure how one can justify the expenditure as a "loss leader". But at the same time, the ad experience is horrendous.

In the last month I have consumed YT on desktop browser, mobile, and regular TV. Guess which is by far the worst experience?

On desktop, you can use an alternate browser or do a reg edit to re-enable manifest v2 plugins (for now) in Chrome, and continue blocking (for now). On mobile you can use alternate apps and frontends.

TV viewing of YT is the worst experience, as there are no native alternative apps and DNS ad blocking doesn't block YT ads. The native YouTube app (on Samsung and LG TVs at least) is horrendous. You get midroll ads sometimes mid-sentence as the content presenter is speaking. Sometimes you get pre-roll ads, disruptive mid roll ads, and then wash it down with a POST-roll ad at the end of the video. Depending on how the content is structured it is disorienting as to whether the video has ended or not.

Say for example its a 30 minute video. I would rather they show 5-7 minutes of predictable ads at the beginning of content, so I can at least have the same experience as broadcast TV, and make an informed decision to get up and use the restroom and feed the pets while the ads roll. Then once the content starts, don't randomly interrupt it.

Imagine the YT model applied to broadcast television. The quarterback drops back to throw a deep pass towards the endzone, and suddenly you find yourself watching an undskippable ad for diarrhea medication, while the football is in the air.

And we wonder why people have ADD.

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

laughs in Graphene OS

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

While this is cool in some ways, handing your phone over during a law enforcement encounter should be an absolute last resort and avoided at all costs.

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 178 points 3 months ago (49 children)

Since the story came out people fixated on "lol he used a shitty gaming controller" but really that is one of the least sketchy design choices in the entire rig. Why reinvent the wheel and make a custom set of controls that are realistically another huge expense and potential failure point, when off the shelf solutions exist for that component?

The corners that were cut are the ones involving the viewport/nose adhesion to the ships frame, and the structural integrity of the carbon fiber hull itself. They had test data suggesting it was a bad idea to engage in repeated dives with their design, and an even worse idea to operate at the depths they chose. They decided to ignore that.

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 6 points 3 months ago

The SSN itself is limited to under 1 billion possible permutations anyway because the format is 9 total digits. (3 digits hyphen 2 digits hyphen 4 digits.)

And if I recall they also have something weird with the state you were born roughly corresponding to which 3 digit prefix you're issued. Obviously that isn't purely true either because that would only give you about 1 million unique numbers per prefix.

Either way they've gotta be close to the theoretical maximum of the format without recycling numbers.

view more: ‹ prev next ›