If you don't want to pay, then don't use it. Regardless of everything, music producers still need to live and pirating is a shit move to help them.
mihies
joined 1 year ago
I don't think Qualcomm can outperform Apple at CPU game out of the blue. They were always trailing behind and Apple has now three generations of M CPUs behind. It'd be nice, though.
Edit: fixed stupid typo - can't outperform -> can outperform
This is all because they failed to award Elmo with those billions. Quick, there is still time to save the company. /s
RIP net neutrality, it was nice knowing you.
TBH from article it seems that woman on photo (Forsén) decided that's enough of sharing her photo.
Every product should have a clear EOL path, most preferably a recyclable one. Indeed it should be on manufacturers shoulders to enable it and on legislation to require it.
To surprise of no-one :)
If it isn't, then there is almost no point in going ARM for Windows. Apple demonstrated that it can be quite lower or better perf at same power consumption.
Yep, yep. Also their ARM chips might quickly become more powerful than x64 ones as is the case with Mx ones. At least when it comes to laptops. The article is really weird by focusing on gaming experience, is this really a big market for laptops?
Exynos are subpar to Qualcomm arm chips, or at least they were not so far ago.
Kudos for paying Spotify (as I do). I disagree on "if they give me shit service" part. If that happens, you have an option to either switch service or don't use any of them. IMO pirating is not an option. Also when pirating though P2P, you also distribute the content.