mindlesscrollyparrot

joined 1 year ago
[–] mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Well thank goodness that Microsoft isn't pushing AI on us as hard as it can, via every channel that it can.

[–] mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do commercial/industrial buildings not require power then?

[–] mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

You aren't wrong, but you are assuming that the grid is required. Solar panels can be installed at the point of use, and then the grid doesn't come into it at all.

So an EU-backed distro could be the same. Yes, they would fund maintainers, but their own maintainers, not maintainers of upstream distros.

[–] mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

How much of Ubuntu's funding goes to supporting debian? I actually don't know.

I don't, for example, see Ubuntu listed here: https://www.debian.org/partners/

[–] mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Well, what better way to embrace FOSS than dismissing the efforts of all the existing distro maintainers? Welcome to the community, guys. Good luck building your cathedral next to the bazaar!

How about they instead work together with the distros and create a way of certifying a distro as gov-ready?

If AIs are to find the solution for us, we need one really smart one, not many AIs that are similarly smart to existing ones. He is proposing building more data centres, ie. the latter option.

If we can spot these trends while working 9-5, then an idiot can probably spot them if they spend 40 hours a week on it.

That is the error that the model made. Your quote talks about the causes of these errors. I asked what caused the model to make this error.

[–] mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Sure, but which of these factors do you think were relevant to the case in the article? The AI seems to have had a large corpus of documents relating to the reporter. Those articles presumably stated clearly that he was the reporter and not the defendant. We are left with "incorrect assumptions made by the model". What kind of assumption would that be?

In fact, all of the results are hallucinations. It's just that some of them happen to be good answers and others are not. Instead of labelling the bad answers as hallucinations, we should be labelling the good ones as confirmation bias.

[–] mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The email says that you can do it. It doesn't say that you can do it without purchasing the upsell option.

view more: next ›