missingno

Can BlueSky really be called decentralized when 99% of it is bluesky.social?

First party games do, with the lone exception of Pokopia. Yoshi and the Mysterious Book, the game they're announcing this new pricing difference for, is a proper cartridge.

I'm not happy about it, but I think it's kind of inevitable. It's not a question of if, but when, and it's not only going to be Nintendo.

In theory, if the technology worked very differently from the way it does now, I could envision a world in which AI NPCs could have potential. But knowing how LLMs actually work, knowing that a lot of the hype behind them is smoke and mirrors, I can't see it being viable. And with the trajectory that the LLM bubble is going, I just don't think it will ever reach a point where I'd trust it.

They're gonna tell you this is the only way to be sure that routers don't contain a backdoor. They're gonna tell themselves this is the only way to be sure that routers do contain a backdoor.

It is theatrics. They know they've already got literally the entire userbase on their server, so none of this actually matters.

When Bluesky inevitably enshittifies, they take the whole network down with them.

BlueSky pays lip service to federation, but they've set it up so that they've got effective control of 99% of the network. It's a sham to convince people they're different from every other corporate-owned social media platform, but it really isn't.

It's a platform fighter.

If we say we don't like and it looks hideous, what exactly are we wrong about? "Actually you really love it!" Fuck off, you can't force us to like your slop no matter how much you try to shove it down our throats.

Attempting to rebrand the terminology to "mystery boxes" like that's gonna make it better ultimately comes across as so much shadier.

Ball Revamped

Highly recommend Mega Knockdown. It perfectly encapsulates the best part of fighting games: getting into your opponent's head by throwing rock four times in a row.