The only thing I would disagree with in this take would be who are you to judge what is and isn't of sufficient redeeming value to override to state of the artist? I would argue that art by definition is subjective and as such making any objective arguments or claims to discredit an artwork simply due to its creator is therefore invalid.
muntedcrocodile
joined 8 months ago
What happened to separating art from the artist?
What u think they will do if they invade/become the dominant global power. My country is at a far greater risk of Chinese invasion than urs. U set precidents the west follows like the good little vassals we are.
As for the un thing that's idiotic the us has veto power.
Riiiight so if its so conspiratorial why has China banned teslas from being within kilometres of any Chinese military establishment?
Fix no, reduce attack surface 100%. Lets say hypotheticaly u know a foreign country is going to fuck u in the ass would you A let them fuck u with 60million dicks or B make it expensive so u are getting fucked over less.
Because no car company would ever lie about the software there cars are running or go to extreme measures to hide that its not what it claims to be when being tested.
I'd prefer to be ground down for profit by greedy american pigs than be put in a concentration camp by the CCP.
Yes, it runs grapheneos.
Irrelevant.
I'm talking about the mass deployment of spying devices across an entire country mapping every street running facial recognition collecting military related data. The idiot who buys the var who cares its everyone else.
Isn't it a national security risk?
Depends what part? But the Aussies defiantly invented wifi
Its perpetually hungry. All that's fucked Hahahaha.
If ur in Australia I'll buy u some ramen