neidu2

Well, if it's against the rules, then it might justify a ban. I'm not going to argue against rules in general, and interpretations thereof.

I'd think that once you're at the level where you not only stick around in the dumpster fire, but also willingly give your money to this manchild, you lack the awareness needed to see how bad a blue checkmark looks on you anyway.

EDIT: I have been informed that some get the blue checkmark against their will and without paying. Just when you thought xitter couldn't get dumber...

I installed Scientific Linux on a brand new intel macbook some 7-8 years ago. Worked pretty well once I realized that MBR boot was not an option. I would think other modern distros would work just as well.

Former FreeBSD user here. I always kept /usr separate, including /usr/home

Short answer: yes

Longer answer: Kali is not intended to be a normal desktop OS. It will work, but ut might be a bit limiting.

If you want a desktop linux with a lot of the security stuff with it, you might want to check out ParrotSec. I used that on my work laptop for a few years.

Probably a bit narrow, but my usecases:

• awk: modify STDIN before it goes to STDOUT. Example: only print the 3rd word for each line
• sed: run a regex on every line.

What's the difference between /bin and /usr/bin and /usr/local/bin from an architectural point of view? And how does sbin relate to this?

Fuckyeah. I need it, so I had to jump through a couple of hoops to get it running on LM21, but good to know that it's default next time I need to install.

Decades? Try centuries.

Could you record an audio clip for those of us who are curious as to how this i pronounced? I tried reading it aloud, but my scandinavian vocal cords don't flex that way.