niartenyaw

joined 1 year ago
[–] niartenyaw@midwest.social 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

and that's unfortunately only true because the greedy groups have destroyed all the non-greedy ones by slaughter or forced participation

[–] niartenyaw@midwest.social 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

we just need to make sure that we don't rely on their instance(s) too heavily so we only have minimal losses when they eventually do drop support.

[–] niartenyaw@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

it may be more comprehensive than trying to scrape other platforms, but the data that is available is absolutely nothing compared to what they collect on their own platforms. they're almost certainly not very concerned with collecting our relatively mild amount of data.

[–] niartenyaw@midwest.social 9 points 5 months ago

now that's an immaculate conception

[–] niartenyaw@midwest.social 1 points 7 months ago

hmm that sounds really interesting! if you end up remembering it and also remember to respond i'd love to know lol. yeah i hope if something good enough comes along two platforms will implement and then others will just follow suit.

[–] niartenyaw@midwest.social 4 points 7 months ago

that's all very fair, i guess i was just hoping federation was at least on a long term roadmap

[–] niartenyaw@midwest.social 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

yeah, i agree that i don't think federation of something like this would be through ActivityPub (matrix has its own). i guess it just feels unfortunate that if users want to access communities across multiple instances, users will have to have separate logins and identities for each one.

[–] niartenyaw@midwest.social 11 points 7 months ago (7 children)

i looked into revolt and pretty concerned with these two stances of the project

We don't think federation is beneficial to Revolt

ref

We have a variety of monetisation ideas lined up internally, with these, it is not my intention for us to paywall features and I find it unlikely we would ever do that considering it would contradict what we're trying to achieve.

ref

like, to me it seems they want to get communities invested and then later monetize in ways those communities don't yet know about?? idk that sounds extremely sus. especially when competing instances will fight against network effects with no federation.

[–] niartenyaw@midwest.social 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I wish we would just keep adding E's so long threads would be REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.

which also happens to be the noise I make when I see them.

[–] niartenyaw@midwest.social 18 points 8 months ago

we also live in a world which has now known that premise and used it for 300 years, which makes it seem much more trivial than it was at the time.

[–] niartenyaw@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the farmer saying he treats the animals like family, which one might imply means he treats them well. but his family has to secretly run away from him due to abuse (insinuated by the wife quickly leaving with the kids). this mean he probably also abuses the animals, which is opposite of the implied meaning.

view more: next ›