nilloc

joined 2 years ago
[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

Is there a just rolled into the shop on Lemmy yet?

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Or these companies could pay to train (no pun intended) technicians to learn the systems they’d like to maintain. No matter how old they are.

Until entropy comes for the actual hardware (assuming they won’t invest in remanufacture or production of replacements). Re-engineering a successfully working system is more costly and might result in worse outcomes, especially in the near term.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 years ago

They fired their whole education wing when my startup was just starting to work with them (15 or something years ago). No warning just a month after starting a new project (early stem outreach type program), fired them all.

So I don’t feel bad for iRobot. Sucks for the employees though.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’d love to hack into all F-150s and remap the maximum throttle opening to maybe 1/2. Also set speed limits to 70 maybe. Or add GPS based limits to keep the fuckers from basically drag racing down my narrow sidewalk less street.

Actually doing Rams is probably best, and remapping diesels to prevent coal rolling would be high on the list too.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 years ago

You’re right, and you’re pretty much describing the sunk cost fallacy as well.

They probably don’t save much money that way though. You stop have to keep the place warm enough and clean enough to prevent mold and frozen pipes. Many are in bigger buildings with cleaning, maintenance and security contracts.

I suspect as dumb as it is, the moronic managers still think micro-managing makes up for the 5-10% cost of employees there (might even be less in some offices). And as said before, they usually at best break even, while alienating the smarter employees who go find wfh jobs.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The leases are often very long term like 5-10 years. So they are locked into paying for the building or risk hurting the company’s credit lines. So in a sense, they have paid for the building use. Which I think was OP’s intent, since they mentioned the lease.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

At 3-5 miles per hour too.

How do these handle on asphalt at 75mph; the overwhelming majority use case for Jeeps in the US

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago

I’ve been recently bingeing Look Mum No Computer’s rescue/re-build/midi-fication of an organ that had been shoehorned into an organist’s home, after the church had been converted. I’m more of an engineer than musician, but it’s amazing how much goes into the layering of sounds from so many different pipes.

My 6 yo loves learning with such a cool soundtrack too.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That’s amazing sounding! Worth the watts, even if I did get church ptsd listening to it.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago

I can’t tell if it’s a Dana Carvey skit, or not.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago

Or the professor who’s profiting off requiring the latest edition of their own book each year.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago

If it was really that thick plate it would be, but making any modern vehicle (that’s not meant for military use in hostile territory) out of thick plate is fucking stupid. And keeping thin stainless flat is really tricky, it wants to have at least a bit of curve to stay rigid. It asoc doesn’t like consistent forming, which is why nobody since Delorean has bothered.

Both for weight, and economy, but also for accident safety—good luck of you’re not also in an armored car, and occupant safety, since the crumble zones are greatly reduced and going to transfer way more energy into your soft tissues and internal organs.

But you can throw a rubber baseball at it just fine at least.

view more: ‹ prev next ›