notabot

joined 1 year ago
[–] notabot@lemm.ee 16 points 3 months ago

It depends what you want to do with it. If it's just for storing files/backups then encrypt them before uploading and make sure the key never goes anywhere near the VPS. If it's for serving up something like a simple website, you probably care more about data integrity than exfiltration, so make sure you have the security, including selinux or equivalent, locked down, and regularly run integrity checks. If it's for running something interactive, or where data will be generated or downloaded to the machine, you're out of luck, there's no even theoretical way of securing that against an adversary with that much access.

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 18 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Not morons, just not educated enough about them to understand exactly what the implications of that action are.

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Look, I'm not attacking them over this, as you rightly said, it has plenty of other drawbacks and concerns, I'm just emphasising that Google do have a large degree of influence over them. For instance, Chromium is dropping manifest v2 support, so Brave pretty much has to do the same. They've said that, as Chromium has a switch to keep it enabled until June (iirc) they've enabled that, but after Chromium drops manifest v2 the most they can do is try to support a subset of it as best they can. The Brave devs may not want to drop support, but Google have decreed it will be dropped, so they end up dropping it and having to put in extra work to keep even a subset working for some period of time.

If Brave gets even a moderate market share, Google will continue to mess them around like this as they really don't like people not seeing their adverts.

Ultimately it's software, so the Brave devs can do pretty much whatever they want, limited by the available time and money. Google's influence extends to making that either easier or harder, it much the same way as they influence the Android ecosystem.

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 8 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Both Brave and Chrome are built on the open-source Chromium browser engine

That's from the Brave website: https://brave.com/compare/chrome-vs-brave/

Yes there are plenty of changes, but it's built on it, and shaped by it, and Chromium is heavily influenced by Google. If chromium doesn't support v2 manifests it is unlikely that Brave will. In this particular case it may be that Brave's ad blocking and privacy features are equivalent to uBO, but it's still underpinned by an engine that Google has strong influence over, so it can't completely shake their influence.

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 22 points 4 months ago

Dude, what are you actually trying to make right now? Like, this isn't flight sim stuff anymore.

It'll only be done when you can get out of your plane, walk around, find a computer and start playing Flight Simulator 2024.

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's a non-starter for me because I sync my notes, and sometimes a subset of my notes, to multiple devices and multiple programs. For instance, I might use Obsidian, Vim and tasks.md to access the same repository, with all the documents synced between my desktop and server, and a subset synced to my phone. I also have various scripts to capture data from other sources and write it out as markdown files. Trying to sync all of this to a database that is then further synced around seems overly complicated to say the least, and would basically just be using Trillium as a file store, which I've already got.

I've also be burnt by various export/import systems either losing information or storing it in a incompatible way.

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago
[–] notabot@lemm.ee 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

If you could, I'd appreciate HackADay. I've found a community for it on lemmy.ml, but it only seems to have one post from a year ago.

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago

NATO's having a presence in a member state is protection. It reduces the chance of opportunists like Putin invading.

Putin tried to call NATO's bluff, using Ukraine as a bargaining chip. NATO didn't blink, and so he started a war. He doesn't get to do the abuser thing of saying "see what you made me do". This is on him, and him alone.

He can demand that NATO withdraw all he likes, and I'd have some sympathy for that if it didn't involve invading another country as leverage. Note, I say some sympathy, not that NATO should actually do it, especially as Putin's regieme has threatened other countries already.

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

So, you're saying that Putin sent demands to NATO, saying they either bend to his will by removing their protection from a large portion of their member states or he'd start a war, and by not signing it NATO are responsible for starting the war? I just want to fully understand your position on this.

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's been years since I had to admin Windows servers, but I was quite impressed with the number of MS products where the install and configuration tools would output the Powershell commands to carry out the changes you'd asked for. It made it quite a lot easier to automate. I'd love to see that paradigm catch on more widely, with the GUI and CLI having the same functionality and the GUI giving you the commands to run.

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago

The movie "Brewster's Millions" is based on that premis.

view more: ‹ prev next ›