notthebees

joined 2 years ago
[–] notthebees@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

On voyager, it shows up as newline. That's an odd one.

[–] notthebees@reddthat.com 5 points 1 day ago

That's actually super neat. They really buried the lead with that article headline.

[–] notthebees@reddthat.com 6 points 1 week ago

I'm personally not pissed but I'm not sure if they're missing something or not. Or just old fashioned ragebaiting. If it's ragebaiting, they got me.

[–] notthebees@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago

Which already has been redesigned by people who know what they're doing. This is just someone making a minimalist phone.

[–] notthebees@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I'm not sure if I'm missing something or not.

I was referring to the Arduino phone. In general you're not wrong.

The scope of the conversation is just the phone itself.

Hardware was designed first, and then they applied software.

Edit: when I meant necessity for the cut down software. I meant it as in "the Arduino is barely fast enough to run the software, any extraneous thing needs to go"

[–] notthebees@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Which already exists and has existed for ages.

Lineage os (Android), e/os (Android), postmarket os (straight up Linux) would all be excellent answers for cutdown/debloatable mobile phone OSes. (also Ubuntu touch and whatever the pinephone shipped with)

Its probably a lot harder making an unintrusive os than it is making this.

This is cutdown hardware leading to simplified and cutdown software as it's a necessity here.

[–] notthebees@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I wouldn't consider it reinventing the wheel. Giant algae tanks to replace trees is reinventing the wheel. They're just making a phone out of parts that would have originally been in a cheap phone at one point (before they got turned into development boards).

If I wanted to be super uncharitable, what the maker did was akin to this.

https://youtu.be/d59J78yhwtg

[–] notthebees@reddthat.com 4 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I think they're having more fun making it than looking for a perfect solution. The fastest way to accomplish this is just buying some flipphone from Kyocera or something.

Also it's a prototype. It wouldn't survive in the real world in it's current state.

[–] notthebees@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago

You need to be able to relock the bootloader after flashing firmware. Pixels can do it and that's it.

[–] notthebees@reddthat.com 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's specifically the ability to relock the bootloader with custom software. Pixels are the only phones that can do it.

[–] notthebees@reddthat.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

I wanted more up to date packages in the "stable" branch of updates and less kernel updates (I already have a debian laptop using testing or unstable packages). It's fine. I'm just gonna yeet snap. I'm using it for ML and Data Science stuff for school work. I can easily explain Ubuntu to people.

 

I have a pretty old laptop with an AMD dGPU and I am trying to do OpenCL compute on it to make sure that device switching is handled correctly in some stuff I am testing. All the instructions I see to install amdgpu drivers is to have --no-dkms as an install flag. Doing amdgpu-install --usecase=opencl --no-dkms --opencl=legacy results in ERROR: using '--no-dkms' with '--opencl=legacy' is not supported

Specs:

HP Pavilion 15-br158cl

CPU: i7-8550u (HD 620 iGPU and this has working compute)

GPU: Radeon 530 2 GB DDR3

RAM: 24 GB

OS: PopOS 22.04 6.12.10-76061203-generic

Clinfo -l output

Platform #0: Intel(R) OpenCL HD Graphics
 -- Device #0: Intel(R) UHD Graphics 620 [0x5917]
Platform #1: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing

As you can see, only the platform, not a second device. Is there anything that I am missing?

I did post this on reddit in the PopOS subreddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/pop_os/comments/1kvza44/is_there_a_way_to_use_amdgpudkms_without_bricking/

view more: next ›