nullify3112

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] nullify3112@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Well, cars suck and 1million would be nice but still won’t but me a home where I live.

[–] nullify3112@lemmy.world 34 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (14 children)

Well they could do it the right way where, for example, you go to your city hall to get a certificate of age where they check your ID. Then some cryptography happens so you only enter a public key from that certificate on a website or OS to verify your age.

The website or OS doesn’t check your ID. City hall doesn’t know your browsing history.

But I’m not fooling myself, that’s not the point of such a law.

[–] nullify3112@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

What is this argument? You and I both know they want this age verification at the OS level for personal computing devices: phones, tablets and computers, maybe watches.

Is this really what’s going to kill this law? Semantics?

[–] nullify3112@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

More like Nuxli. Sounds like a cereal brand.