ooli

joined 1 year ago
[–] ooli@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

5k hour in Tales of Maj Eyal :https://store.steampowered.com/app/259680/Tales_of_MajEyal/

Beat it in every difficulty once.. except the last one. Half of my time must be on trying that.

[–] ooli@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

bon c'est théo qui avait raison. Il est 80 millions plus riche.. heureusement qu'il a pas écouté ton conseil de polkadot

[–] ooli@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Heu , le mec espere gagner 80 million d'ici une semaine. A 13k / jour, il lui faudrait 10 ans pour gagner la même somme. sans compter que ca sonne ridicule de miser sur un truc qui s'appele polkadot.. en même temps miser sur trump, sonne pas trés malin non plus

 

The man who is betting more than $30 million on a Donald Trump victory wants you to know that he isn’t trying to manipulate the U.S. election.

“My intent is just making money,” the man, who called himself Théo, said during a Zoom call with a reporter from The Wall Street Journal earlier this week. He described himself as a Frenchman who had previously lived in the U.S. and worked as a trader for banks.

Théo’s huge wagers on Polymarket—a prediction market that isn’t open to Americans—drew broad attention last month after the Journal reported that four accounts on the platform had been systematically purchasing wagers on a Trump victory. The bets lifted Trump’s odds of beating Vice President Kamala Harris, as shown on Polymarket. Blockchain data showed that the accounts were all funded by the same crypto exchange, fueling debate about the motives of the “Trump whale” behind them.

Last week, New York-based Polymarket said it had contacted the Trump whale as part of an investigation into the wagers. The company described the person behind the bets as a French national with extensive trading experience and a financial-services background. The shadow of former President Donald Trump is projected on a U.S. flag as he attends a rally in Green Bay, Wis. Photo: brendan mcdermid/Reuters

“Based on the investigation, we understand that this individual is taking a directional position based on personal views of the election,” Polymarket said in a statement.

The details in Polymarket’s statement lined up with how Théo described himself. He confirmed that he had spoken to a member of Polymarket’s legal and compliance team.

Election watchers are poring over any and all data in an effort to predict the outcome of one of the most contentious—and, seemingly, close—U.S. presidential elections on record. Prediction markets that allow people to place bets on a variety of potential events have emerged as one possible way to forecast election winners. Historical research suggests that, more often than not, the presidential candidate with the best odds in betting markets before Election Day goes on to take the White House.

Yet the emergence of the Trump whale exposes the limits of today’s prediction markets: Even though volumes have surged on Polymarket this year, it is still small enough for one wealthy, opinionated individual to push prices around with a multimillion-dollar bet.

Théo emailed the Journal after the publication of an Oct. 18 article about his wagers. To prove that he was behind the Polymarket wagers, the Journal asked him to place a bet on whether Taylor Swift would announce that she is pregnant in 2024—one of the many small, nonpolitical wagers available on the platform. Minutes later, Polymarket’s website showed that one of the four accounts, Theo4, had placed a small bet on Swift’s pregnancy.

During the Zoom call, Théo wore a gray Nike sweater and sported a short, neatly trimmed beard. Speaking English with a slight accent, he said he had made his bets after concluding that polls were underestimating Trump’s support. He denied speculation that his wagers were aimed at creating a sense of momentum for Trump.

Théo declined to give his real name, and the Journal wasn’t able to confirm all the elements of his story. Although Théo said he was funding the bets with his own money, it couldn’t be determined whether this is true. Nor could the Journal rule out links between Théo and any political organization or Trump allies.

“I have absolutely no political agenda,” Théo wrote in his initial email.

Théo said he didn’t want to share his name because his own friends and children don’t know the extent of his wealth, and he doesn’t want them to know about his Trump bet. He described himself as a veteran financial investor willing to risk tens of millions of dollars on high-conviction trades. But political betting was new for him, Théo said.

Théo said he took an interest in U.S. polling data earlier this year. He observed that many polls underestimated Trump’s support in 2016 and 2020, and concluded that if Trump outperformed again this year, he would beat Harris. Théo also cited the “shy Trump voter effect”—the idea that people were reluctant to tell pollsters that they supported Trump.

“I know a lot of Americans who would vote for Trump without telling you that,” Théo said. Asked about changes that pollsters had made in their methodologies in an attempt to fix the problems of 2016 and 2020, Théo was dismissive, saying he had “not seen anything substantial.”

Théo sent dozens of emails to the Journal reporter over a two-week period. In many of them, he criticized polls from mainstream-media outlets that he saw as skewed in favor of Harris. On the Zoom call, he alleged that Democrat-aligned media organizations were laying the groundwork for social unrest by stoking expectations of a close race, instead of the Trump blowout that he anticipates.

Théo said he was caught by surprise when his trades drew public attention. He started quietly in August by betting several million dollars on Trump, using an account with the username Fredi9999. At the time, Trump and Harris had roughly even chances on Polymarket.

Théo spread out his wagers over multiple days and weeks to avoid causing a price spike. Still, as his bets grew, Théo noticed other traders were backing away from quoting prices when Fredi9999 was buying. That made it harder for Théo to get attractive prices. He created the other three accounts in September and October to obscure his purchasing, Théo said.

Now, Théo could get a payday of more than $80 million-—more than double his investment—if all of his expectations of a sweeping Trump victory come true. Besides his main wager on Trump winning the Electoral College, Théo has bet millions more on Trump winning the popular vote—a scenario that many political observers consider unlikely—and on Trump winning individual swing states such as Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin.

If Harris wins, Théo could lose most or all of his $30 million, which he described as the majority of his available liquid assets.

He is such a big trader on Polymarket that he is effectively stuck, unable to exit his wagers without crashing the market. The four “Trump whale” accounts collectively hold about 25% of the contracts on Trump winning the Electoral College and over 40% of the contracts on Trump winning the popular vote, according to data provider Polymarket Analytics.

Théo admitted feeling nervous. He voiced confidence that Trump would win—assessing his odds of winning the election at 80% to 90%—but fretted that his bets could be thrown off by an unexpected last-minute news development.

“A surprise can always occur,” Théo said.

[–] ooli@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
 

Lequel d'entre vous ?

The "whale" placing big bets on Polymarket in favor of Donald Trump winning the November election is a French national with extensive trading and financial services experience.

Polymarket confirmed to DealBook that some speculation about the whale was correct: A single trader controls the four accounts that have been placing the bets.

The accounts on Polymarket — Fredi9999, Theo4, PrincessCaro, and Michie — had $45 million in open positions as of Thursday morning, per data from the crypto-based betting website.

Most of those bets favor Trump winning the presidential election and the popular vote next month, along with some bets favoring Republican wins in closely contested swing states.

Polymarket said it launched an investigation into the four accounts with the help of outside experts and made contact with the trader.

The betting site told DealBook that it had found no evidence of attempted market manipulation and said that the trader was "taking a directional position based on personal views of the election." Related stories

An analysis by BI found that one of the accounts, Theo4, had made as many as 71 bets a minute earlier this week, and two accounts, Theo4 and Fredi9999, had made as many as 2,500 bets in a 24-hour period.

The flurry of bets ranged from as little as a dollar to tens of thousands of dollars. Given the French national's trading experience, they were likely intended to prevent the price of the betting contracts from rising too much.

Polymarket said that the trader had agreed "not to open further accounts without notice," DealBook reported.

The betting website also said that its current contract odds for a Trump win in November were pretty close to those of other betting websites.

As of Thursday morning, Polymarket's betting odds for Trump winning the presidential election stand at 62% versus 38% for Harris. Kalshi's betting odds favor Trump at 59% compared to 41% for Harris, while the betting website PredictIt has Trump at 58 cents and Harris at 47 cents.

While the odds across the major betting websites favor a Trump win next month, the polls tell a different story.

Harris slightly outperformed Trump on Thursday in the latest national polling average compiled by RealClearPolitics, with Harris at 48.7% and Trump at 48.5%.

[–] ooli@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

where the link to the download?

[–] ooli@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (6 children)

You're right people will never ride a horse instead of their car. (Plus it seems horses would be worse for the environment) But the 2k people who own 50% (?) of world wealth have more say on how the resources are used than the 99.99% of other people. And like them those 2k don't want to ride horses. On the contrary they want to use all the resources for their own benefit. So getting ride of them could allow to implement some sustainable practice they are fighting against.

But it is a joke in the end: Having 2k oligarchs run over by a trolley wont save the planet. What need to be run over is the system that allow 2k people control the fate of all the others through greed.

[–] ooli@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago (7 children)

The fact that the greatest nation on earth had such dumbass actors presidents, is the only proof I need for the existence of the Illuminati, and their desire to pupeeteer some tv-personality they put on the throne

[–] ooli@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

this is reactive! and a good sign for the lemmy community

[–] ooli@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago (32 children)

I didnt know about that. This is a bit scary to be honest, and the first time I feel a bit taken aback with lemmy

[–] ooli@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Probably, but one thing I learned too late in my life is that by being cynical you're assured to never get anything done

[–] ooli@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

time to go edit all my old comment with random garbage generated by chatgpt

[–] ooli@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Wait till he buy Lemmy

view more: next ›