orangeboats

joined 1 year ago
[–] orangeboats@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In the past, fitness (and hence its proxy parameters like height and other beauty standards) correlated to the survivability of your bloodline. So it makes sense that people are programmed, to a certain degree, to admire things like tallness.

Nowadays because of technology the correlation no longer exists, or at the very least it is much diminished. But the programming is still there right in our DNA, so as a people we should artificially override this natural instinct because it no longer serves a purpose.

[–] orangeboats@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Well, tallness surely would be a preferable criteria back then! To a certain extent, it is a proxy parameter for fitness.

I just think we can actually use evolution to explain a lot of things that we do, it doesn't mean we should do it.

[–] orangeboats@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Unfortunately not just America. Heightism is also prevalent in a big part of Asia.

This is most likely one of the quirks brought to you by Survival of the Fittest rule. Thanks, evolution.

[–] orangeboats@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

For SSDs this has historically not been the case, there's no way in hell you could buy a 1TB SSD within $200 a decade ago.

[–] orangeboats@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's not just DNS. I have this rule in my firewall:

udp dport 15600 counter drop comment "Block Samsung TV shenanigans"

So far, it has blocked 20575 packets (constituting 1304695 bytes) in 6 days and 20 hours.

[–] orangeboats@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Anticheats can be very invasive, they can theoretically scan all the files inside your computer (whether it is practically done, I don't know but it surely feels like it's been done), take screenshots regularly, send your hardware information, etc. So yeah, if you are someone who takes security seriously...

[–] orangeboats@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

For many systems out there, /bin and /lib are no longer a thing. Instead, they are just a link to /usr/bin and /usr/lib. And for some systems even /sbin has been merged with /bin (in turn linked to /usr/bin).

[–] orangeboats@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Not just Linux... 99% of the time you see something weird in the computing world, the reason is going to be "because history."

[–] orangeboats@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

The C developers are the ones with the ageist mindset.

The Rust developers certainly are not the ones raising the point "C has always worked, so why should we use another language?" which ignores the objective advantages of Rust and is solely leaning on C being the older language.

[–] orangeboats@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They very rarely have memory and threading issues

It's always the "rarely" that gets you. A program that doesn't crash is awesome, a program that crashes consistently is easy to debug (and most likely would be caught during development anyway), but a program that crashes only once a week? Wooo boy.

People vastly underestimate the value Rust brings by ensuring the same class of bugs will never happen.

[–] orangeboats@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ah you got my comment wrong! I didn't mean to suggest Gecko is closed source. I just wanted another web engine that is also open source.

[–] orangeboats@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (10 children)

Servo was an experimental ground for Mozilla in some ways (like testing out a new CSS engine and porting it back to Gecko if it works). So it's quite normal for people to be unaware of it, it was not meant for the public.

But later on it was abandoned by Mozilla and stuck in a limbo, until it got picked up by the Linux Foundation. Now it's a standalone project and I wish them well. We really need a new FOSS web engine.

view more: next ›