As an unrelated point, when I searched again just now, most of the entries in the search engine were from Lemmy/Mbin, followed by Mastodon. Mostly this post and others like it
So you got this survey in an email. Was the link intended to be shared like this? Can I find the survey link somewhere on Mozilla’s own websites?
The email was through their newsletter and I would have offered to forward it, if it didn't have personal information in it. Maybe someone else who is subscribed to the newsletter can back up the claim instead?
I actually searched for the website link to put in the post body before sharing, and went through a similar thought process as yours when I didn't find it. My reasons for sharing it anyway were:
- Sometimes these emails say to not share it further, but this one didn't
- I see it shared already in a few places unofficially (Mastodon, Reddit, Twitter)
- It mentioned 'Mozilla Community' and not a more specific group, so this audience seemed appropriate
- People here might have better feedback than I could write up, so it should be a net positive for Mozilla
It would be nice if they did post about it on an official account to resolve any concerns. If it helps, it looks like "mozillafoundation.tfaforms.net" has been used for other surveys in the past and so you might find a link to that domain from an official source
edit:
their website has links to that domain based on a search of the GitHub repo
For example, the 'Submit a product here' link on this page: https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/privacynotincluded/
It's also possible to submit without filling in the demographic questions if people are concerned but still want to submit
~~I see a textbox saying "What do you want to see from Mozilla in the future?" You could add it there, as justification for why you want them to focus less on it~~
There is a text box part way through, I included my more general thoughts there
(my comment was getting rambly)
Specific to generative AI, I think client side generation can be a good thing, such as sentiment analysis or better word suggestions/autocomplete.
A number of other helpful tasks have negative outcomes, but if someone is going to use it, then I prefer they use the version of the tech that minimizes those negative outcomes. Whether Mozilla should be focussing on building that is a different matter though
AI that isn't generative AI has a lot of positive uses, but usually that's not what these discussions are about
Very cool, and thank you for taking the time to make such a detailed post!
If you are using any Synology products with your setup, you should go ahead and apply the recommended updates
I'd imagine it's the same as personal finance apps. A spreadsheet can be enough, and it is enough for a lot of people, but a custom app can make things easier:
- reducing the friction of keeping track
- built in visualizations
- alerts
- integrating the data with other tools
etc.
Something being FOSS doesn't necessarily mean it's safe / ethical, but a LOT of FOSS apps are designed with those principles in mind.
However, being FOSS means that if an app claims that it is safe / ethical (ex. In this case, not storing data anywhere but on your device), you or an experienced peer can check the code to verify that fact.
Good note, I didn't notice that in the original post. I edited the title
I wonder if there is any pattern to those numbers
edit: ah I didn't notice, thanks all :)
There was the attack on the Internet archive recently, are there any good options out there to help mirror some of the data or otherwise provide redundancy?
Oh nice, the Android app is out!
I can give it a try now
Link to download page within the account settings, for those that have been onboarded already: https://loops.video/dashboard/get-the-app
Edit: it feels very smooth