Absolutely, and it's by design by candid admission of environmentalist organizations and green parties. Their objective was over regulating the industry beyond any rationality and they succeeded.
pizzazz
joined 1 year ago
Lemy has such a hard on against nuclear. I'm seeing reports by antinuclear think tank grifters shoved in my face almost daily...
Username checks out
You guys are as unbearable as door to door evangelists
Because solar panel efficiency is already pretty low so it's best to put them in the areas and in the orientation in which they will receive the most light
Exactly. An idiot like this should never be enrolled in a technical university.
Right now the comparison between France (61 GWs of installed nuclear) and Germany (130+ -!!!- GWs of installed renewables) is disastrous. Their choice to phase out their remaining plants was criminal but the policy is dumb in general, tying themselves to coal and gas power for the realistic future. I'm very curious to see when (or if) they'll ever get to the same emission levels and how much time and money they'll have wasted by then.
BTW. Nuclear Power Plants pay themselves up in decades of operation. Of course a privateer is not extremely keen in this kind of investment. That is exactly why countries are supposed to invest in strategic infrastructure, which are partly indirectly financed by privateers through treasury bonds.
I like how governments are supposed to shit their money out of the window to support renewables with billions in incentives but when the matter is investment in nuclear power suddenly it's unsustainable economics. Let's ask Germany how their 600+ billion euro "energiewende" is going shall we?
I don't think you understand what the alternatives are
Are the people making you deppthroat bugs in the room with us right now?
view more: next ›
Woa bro I was saying hard on but this is a full on raging erection maybe you should deal with your frustrations