pycorax

I guess? Although that's not what I was referring to anyways. Whether your government considers a nation an enemy or not doesn't mean that other nation isn't hostile to yours and the people in it.

I don't think it's hypocritical if you're against a foreign nation from using your own nation's tech in their military, especially if it's hostile towards yours? That seems like a no brainer. It's like selling weapons to your enemy, that's essentially treason (not that it means anything right now with Trump lol). It's only hypocritical if they are against it simply for using it.

Same here and with the price of GPUs, raytracing is expensive as hell for the wallet and it's straight up not a good value.

Samsung does too but I've not set it up as such. Instead, it automatically locks the device from biometric unlocks every 24 hours until you login with your pin again.

Same, it's clean, straightforward and fast unlike the shitty web wrapper that is the new Outlook. If they go ahead with this, I might actually just go ahead and start writing a clone.

Yup, it's really neat

I've been using Notepads (yes with an extra S) instead of Notepad for ages now and it's a pretty good and fast option with a nice modern design even before MS changed up Notepad.

Not to mention, Apple is able to afford the larger die size per chip since they do vertical integration and don't have to worry about the cost of each chip in the way that Intel and AMD has to when they sell to device manufacturers.

That's actually hilarious that this outlet thought a animated video was real.

That's not really how it works actually. You got sort of the idea that ARM is a Reduced Instruction Set Computer (RISC) architecture but the reduction here refers more to the variety of instructions rather than amount of instructions. In fact ARM typically requires more instructions since there's less varieity.

But that really doesn't mean much in modern processor architectures since all modern processors decode assembly instructions into micro operations internally and execute them. Each instruction and their corresponding micro operations may have a different number of cpu cycles to execute so it's not something that's so easily calculatable.

The age of RISC vs CISC (x86, etc) debates has largely ended because of how modern CPUs work. The difference between instruction sets mostly just come down to the language that compilers translate to.

What do you mean by understanding the difference between instruction sets?

I'm curious to see how Valve will respond to this seeing as they have CS. I imagine they'd be interested to build a solution but I'm not sure how plausible that even is.