qjkxbmwvz

joined 9 months ago
[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 4 points 7 months ago

We're considering a new car (current car is an old econobox that's been to the moon), and range anxiety does factor in for the "weekend adventure" use case. We live in CA, and something like a trip to Yosemite or Tahoe requires refuelling/charging. But these places can get inundated with weekend warriors (like us!), who are all on the same schedule. We've had friends who have had stressful incidents e.g. charging in Yosemite valley, or on the way back from Tahoe. Add a toddler in the mix and it gets even less fun.

Not insurmountable, but infrastructure and timing are still not as good as for dinosaur blood.

For 95% of the time though yeah


commuting, single-day adventures, or bopping around the city would be no problem at all.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah, I guess it's a matter of what the analogy is to "page." I would say my computer is the book, and the pages are the software. If some developer wants to make a piece of shit ad ridden software, well, great


but I won't install it :)

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website -1 points 7 months ago

Yeah I think we're in violent agreement to an extent


as I said in my last graf, if it's effectively changing the user agreement, absolutely not ok. But if it's a shitty product to begin with, then I'm just not going to buy it in the first place.

So yeah, Windows doing shitty things for users who have already paid for the product is definitely not cool. But for all users going forward to have a shitty experience? That's... shitty, yeah, but I personally don't think it should be illegal?

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

even though the bank technically owns this shit

Nah, they just have a substantial lien against the property :)

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

In the US, I think you would be entitled by law to know the reason why you were rejected ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Credit_Opportunity_Act ).

Does the UK have something similar?

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 27 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

We tried personally evaluating people for loans on their individual merits, and shocker, there was rampant racism and sexism. Having strict metrics, instead of relying on the whims of a dickwad loan agent, is a good thing.

The new system isn't perfect, and yeah, it completely favors people who have parents who know how the system works. But at least it's not explicitly racist or sexist (again, there are of course systemic issues that feed into it).

I get that it's frustrating to, for example, need to have debt in order to qualify for more debt. But in other contexts this is pretty standard


it's essentially "financial experience."

But yeah. It sucks that you should pay expenses with a credit card rather than debit in the USA. Personally it doesn't matter to me (I pay them off every month), but it sucks for merchants who get stuck with the credit card transaction fees.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 3 points 7 months ago

Maybe both? BSD for his server, Slackware for his desktop. Or something.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's from Phoronix. This is kinda what they do. It's not worthy of the front page of the Wall Street Journal, but then, no one said it was....

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 6 points 7 months ago

As others have said, it's a bit outdated. Being slow is one thing, but having limited software support can be very frustrating.

If possible I would try for a raspberry pi instead, as those have very strong ecosystems (yes, there are problems, but still


it's a big community). A 5 with 8GB would be ideal, but something lower spec (even a 3) would probably still be more capable.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website -2 points 7 months ago

Yes, the taxation is regressive, but the benefits are progressive. E.g.,

According to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, for people in the bottom fifth of the earnings distribution, the ratio of benefits to taxes is almost three times as high as it is for those in the top fifth.

( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Security_(United_States) )

It's certainly not a perfect system, but personally I think it has some merit. And it's by far not the worst aspect of USA tax structure (in my opinion).

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Not sure I get why social security being flat with a cap benefits one class over the other.

Sure, once I meet the max contribution then my withholding goes down and my take home increases. But anything in excess of the max contribution doesn't affect social security payouts after retirement


if you put in more, you get out more, and if you're capped in your contributions then you're also capped in your withdrawals.

Is it a paternalistic program? Sure, it's essentially a forced retirement plan. Its implementation isn't perfect, but I'm not sure I'd call it class warfare.

view more: ‹ prev next ›