real_squids

Go into the search bar and type "technology". You will see many of them.

They don't need "sane", they need willing and obedient

more like very sad

Mute the poster?

I'm sure they'll be just fine if we "get" their games for free, they need to get used to not owning my money. Regardless, buying every new Ubisoft game is kinda pointless. I try one every 3-4 years, not much changes in a year.

Temporal AA doesn't look good compared to what?

Compared to some older AA tech. TAA is awful in motion in games. edit: by default. if there's a config file it can be made better edit2: sometimes no AA is clean as fuck, depends on the game and resolution

What do you mean "real resolution goes down"? Down from where?

I mean internal resolution. Playing at 1080p with DLSS means the game doesn't render at your specified resolution, but a fraction of it. Native (for now) is the best looking.

What is "image quality" in your view?

Mostly general clarity and stuff like particle effects, textures, stuff like that I think. You can ask those people directly, you know. I'm just the messenger, I barely play modern games.

I don't know ... a lot of the terms you're using are supposed to mean

Yeah, that's a problem. More people should be aware of the graphical effects in games. Thankfully some games now implement previews for damn near every quality toggle.

DLSS is one of those things where I'm not even sure what people are complaining about when they complain about it.

Mostly performance, from what I've seen. That hardware requirements go up, while the real (edit: internal) resolution goes down, meanwhile the image quality is stagnant. It's not completely the DLSS's fault though.

I think temporal antialiasing never looks good. I don't really care to talk about dlss though, I just shut up and avoid upscaling (unless it's forced grrrr).

Calamari Racing Team. It's mostly a counter-movement to r/Motorcycles, where most of the posters are seen as anti-fun. Their whole thing is that, not just a specific way to ride, they also have a legendary commenter that pays money for pics in full leather.

everything else reliant on it cruise control, lane assist,

That's stuff's on buttons in many, many cars.

back up cams are all either unnecessary

They really aren't. With thicker pillars (for better safety, but also sometimes for design purposes) the more cameras you have - the better.

You can still buy incredibly simple cars, just look at PSA, Dacia/Renault basic models or Fiats that have been in production for years. Hell, Mitsubishi ASX turns 15 and all they did was stick a big screen for a radio. Suzuki S-cross imo is the sweet spot, a small screen for 2 functions (radio/phone audio, camera) and physical controls for the rest.

Or just don't buy new cars. I think you'd like VW Up, big selling point of it was the lack of a navigation system because they get outdated so quickly, so instead there's just a nav holder.

I think those old toyota and saab (orange or green is best) screens are nicer to look at than most new ones. Btw have any automakers even tried going above 60hz refresh rates? lol

Oh, there have been attempts. Joystick controls, for example, in Mercedes concepts (F 200, SL R129 Concept, Vario Research car), or in actual farming vehicles. Recently, several automakers tried yokes. For now wheel is the cheapest (and simplest) way to make a car steer, we'll see some funky shapes probably.

edit: also if steer-by-wire takes off, I imagine physical steering linkage would still be required. In that case it wouldn't save money.

You could even squeeze a quadruple A game on there