realharo

That seems like a silly argument to me. A bit like claiming a piracy site is not responsible for hosting an unlicensed movie because you have to search for the movie to find it there.

(Or to be more precise, where you would have to upload a few seconds of the movie's trailer to get the whole movie.)

If the point is to prove that the model contains an encoded version of the original article, and you make the model spit out the entire thing by just giving it the first paragraph or two, I don't see anything wrong with such a proof.

Your previous comment was suggesting that the entire article (or most of it) was included in the prompt/context, and that the part generated purely by the model was somehow generic enough that it could have feasibly been created without having an encoded/compressed/whatever version of the entire article somewhere.

Which does not appear to be the case.

Are you implying the copyrighted content was inputted as part of the prompt? Can you link to any source/evidence for that?

Such things are a popular malware vector too.

Add a depth sensor?

This is from over a month ago.

Out of context, on its own, it wouldn't be. But if you look at who is pushing it, that changes the picture.