realitista

joined 2 years ago
[–] realitista@lemm.ee 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Steps forward are few and far between these days, I'll take what I can get.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/6121775

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/technology by /u/lurker_bee on 2025-06-20 05:10:26+00:00.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's not an experience I'm willing to pay for in its current form. But I could definitely see a path for it to become one, thanks for putting it on my radar.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

I'm okay except for the walled garden part. I get referred to articles in many ways, none of them in Apple News. If I can ever log into the actual publications sites with my Apple ID and get the article, then I'm on.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah that's what I used for the first 6 months to try it out.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I used Kagi for a few months when other engines failed. It did come through a few times. But paying $5 a month to get one extra good search result per month was a hard sell for me. If they offered a much much smaller package of lime 20-50 searches per month or just pay as you go, I'd definitely be in.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 19 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

I'd say their decision making was mostly forced by their drop in ad revenue and subscriptions forced by the internet.

Though I do wish that someone would make a Spotify for news so that I could pay once and get access to all of them and at least give them 10 cents per article or something, because I will never pay the subscription cost any are asking.

As much as I'd like to support them, the price to utility ratio is way the fuck off at the prices they ask now.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Exactly. The only way is to block it and then choose something on your device whenever you want to show them something, and never let them use it without you choosing the content. The algorithm will always lead them to the darkest bowels of garbage content in my experience.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

The stuff he was watching was more "am I gonna catch Mikey? Mikey is a chicken" kind of stuff. If he was really learning about the mechanics and how to program stuff in Minecraft with redstone or something, I could get behind it. I know Minecraft well enough to know the junk from the good stuff. And he watched probably 10 videos like this every day for more than a year, so I think from those thousands of videos he's learned whatever he would have learned already.

Now instead he is mostly watching chess videos and playing on an app called ChessKid which I'm much more happy with.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah I mean if a parent was always curing the content, it could be useful. But to me that's the same as not letting them have it, you just put on some YouTube videos every so often for them that you choose on your device (we do this now, I just don't allow it on their devices).

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah, I mean we do sometimes watch YouTube videos together when they ask about a certain topic. I can see how if you only allowed them to use it supervised it could be a valuable thing. But it's tough to keep it only supervised. When my son had it, it ended up being just blippy and Minecraft videos. Not terrible stuff but not stuff I want him spending an hour a day on either.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 10 points 3 weeks ago (13 children)

In the time I allowed my kids to have YT kids, I did not encounter the content you speak of. I know there's good content on YouTube, I watch it all the time. But I never saw anything good come up in the YouTube kids app. And we had it for a while.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 44 points 3 weeks ago (19 children)

That's why I've blocked YouTube on all my kids devices. It's just a pipeline of pure garbage content for kids.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/5691972

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/technology by /u/Wagamaga on 2025-04-19 17:06:58+00:00.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/5292633

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/science by /u/calliope_kekule on 2025-03-01 05:53:17+00:00.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/5180379

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/technology by /u/nimicdoareu on 2025-02-15 16:52:57+00:00.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/5024630

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/technology by /u/Loki-L on 2025-01-27 15:01:51+00:00.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/4604618

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/technology by /u/chrisdh79 on 2024-12-07 16:55:13+00:00.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/3524209

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/technology by /u/wish-u-well on 2024-07-27 02:37:53+00:00.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/2686042

Humane AI Pin: much-hyped gadget rocked by bad reviews

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/technology by /u/BubblyMcnutty on 2024-04-17 10:40:02.

view more: next ›