realitista

Thanks for letting me know about this. Just installed it. Now if they supported multiple mastodon accounts, I'd really be cooking.

Funny they killed the free tier almost the same day as Microsoft made the outlook announcement. I dumped both of them for Thunderbird. Not as pretty but does the job for the limited use case I have:

Me too.

This is a key part of fascism, government and industry being one and the same entity.

Next pump and dump: the American economy.

Inferior range, potential for interference, power consumption, meshing, and security. Name one area where it's better.

And I still expect one or more of these companies to break the standard to create their own walled garden.

Zwave and zigbee have never needed a cloud.

I live in a country with 10 million people and it works here. But yes there are probably some that don't have the frequencies.

I would argue you get what you pay for in terms of interoperability and reliability, but I can imagine people willing to trade some of that for a lower price.

Still on zwave which works great. Don't see the point of this standard which runs over an inferior type of networking and is brought to us by the companies that created the interoperability problem in the first place.

I wonder why both isn't possible, build some into the chip but leave some DIMMs for upgradeability too at bit lower speed.