redcalcium

joined 2 years ago
[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Errant settings that marked the account as delinquent/unpaid at the end of the month, triggering immediate and irrecoverable account deletion. Basically, the scariest part of the google cloud is if they think you can't pay anymore, even if it's a mistake, your account will be wiped along with the backups. They did say they'll have more safeguard after this, but finger crossed.

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 2 points 1 year ago

I imagine the malware binary includes a lua interpreter for executing scripts fetched from its command and control server.

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 26 points 1 year ago (6 children)

During the initial deployment of a Google Cloud VMware Engine (GCVE) Private Cloud for the customer using an internal tool, there was an inadvertent misconfiguration of the GCVE service by Google operators due to leaving a parameter blank. This had the unintended and then unknown consequence of defaulting the customer’s GCVE Private Cloud to a fixed term, with automatic deletion at the end of that period. The incident trigger and the downstream system behavior have both been corrected to ensure that this cannot happen again.

Your data is safe in the cloud with multiple redundant backups, unless your account is marked as delinquent which will be deleted immediately and irrevocably.

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not a data leak, it's a a leak of internal documentation in a google api client which supposedly contains "leaks" of how the google algorithm might works, e.g. the existence of domain authority attribute that google denied for years. I haven't actually dig in to see if its really a leak or was overblown though.

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe, maybe not. Who knows. Not everyone will switch to Linux, but those who do must be introduced to it somehow. My first experience with Linux 18 years ago was very painful yet I eventually made the switch a few years later.

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 19 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Let him go back to Windows. You already planted the idea of using Linux in his head. Next time he gets tired of windows for any reason, he knows there is an alternative and he'll consider switching to Linux on his own.

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 3 points 1 year ago

Play with friends you say? Another game I'll never play...

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Damn, if the car's body is full with sharp edges, what would happen if it hit a pedestrian? Instant decapitation?

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They have no incentive to optimize the Red Engine anymore since CD Projekt is moving to Unreal Engine.

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 200 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Blocking adblockers apparently doesn't work well enough so google resorts to various forms of gaslighting (delayed video playback, api randomly returning wrong video, and now skipping video straight to the end).

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Generally yes, but keep in mind that apt packages are maintained by canonical, while snap packages could be maintained by canonical, the apps' original developers themselves (e.g. Firefox snap is maintained by Mozilla), or a 3rd party unrelated to canonical or the app's developer (i.e. random dudes packaging apps into snap and submit them). If the snap packages are not maintained by canonical, there is nothing stopping the snap packagers to use a different versioning scheme, though it's unlikely. In general, it's a good idea to check the package entry on snapcraft.io to figure out who packaged them so you can decide if it's trustworthy or not.

view more: ‹ prev next ›