That was one my points.
Searx, has no ads, and is federated, And so is Mastodon, Lemmy and so on.
It seems almost as if if you use 3rd party ooen source federated sites, you dont even have to worry about blocking them to begin with.
Jokes on them as I don't care about my warranties, never did. Call me a dumb consumer, but atleast I wrecked the big evil corporation.
edit: I didn't know about Nintnedo doing this, I just knew about the cheaply made joycons that would drift by deSign after a certain point. The sollution to this was so simple but Nintendo chose not to fix it for the entire Switch's life spawn.
Leaving it up to 3rd party switch controller manufacturers. Which who knows how long untill they try to ban 3rd party controllers on Nintendo consoles.
What would be a good alternative for Meta to use to user count to prove Threads is succesful?
There was a u.s law passed just a few months ago that makes it illegal in the u.s to talk against Israel.
There are allot of sentences stating what could be antisemitic but it's not limited to those, and theirs a specific definition it tells people to look at.
However, there are many reasons that add up to why the video may had been removed. I personally don't think there was exclusively just one specific one reason for the videos removal but a atleast a couple of leading factors.
Some examples of what might add up to why it was removed could be,
2)many countries concluded together and have a more united focus on tackling hateful speech. Trying to keep the world at a peaceful state, especially for minority groups that need these protections.
There are a few others I can't think of right this second. but all these reasons add up to the final decision for the moderation action of the video takedown.
If only fans is not encrypted, wouldn't these cops have other ways to detect and tackle csam material?
Assuming it is not encrypted, what's stopping them from doing their job? Only thing I can think of they could use as an excuse would be, accessing copyrighted materials, especially since it's under a pay wall.
There was a post about this on lemmy awhile ago, I'm not sure which specific community it was i'm subscribed to a few tech related ones, but it was atleast a week or 2 or more ago about this same story.
I do agree that there should be more workers than 30 on one of the most known encrypted messaging apps.
They want to squeeze out that extra bit of profit and get the users that never subscribed on there so they can boast about improved numbers.
if your internet can handle the bandwith for cloud gaming app Luna can do wonders.
In the sense that there are different servers for the same service, but it's not a social platform.