sabreW4K3

joined 8 months ago
[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 9 points 2 months ago

I do not know anyone that streams games that wouldn't happily pay £10 a month

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 22 points 2 months ago

Loved the branding and was so hopeful, but like everyone else, I long thought the project was dead.

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 3 points 2 months ago
[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 17 points 2 months ago (11 children)
  1. Matrix has nothing to do with the Fediverse.
  2. Given that they'll regularly push updates of Element to the Play Store without tagging releases on their repository, effectively leaving F-Droid users without releases and with a clogged up Play Store, I'm unsure why you're surprised at the lack of sense of duty to users.
  3. There is no real three.
[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

FYI, this was posted a couple weeks ago https://biglemmowski.win/post/1993687

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Someone posted something recently that checked a bunch of functionality across different networks.

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 1 points 2 months ago

Exactly! To say it's very right wing would be an understatement.

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yup. Pretty much the same thing but on a different network.

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 7 points 2 months ago (4 children)

That's a Nostr relay, nothing to do with the Fediverse.

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because I would like to be able to start a conversation on my phone and finish it on my tablet

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Ah, seems SimpleX isn't the potential messenger I was hoping for.

83
GoToSocial announce comment controls (gts.superseriousbusiness.org)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
 

Full toot

If you follow any of the #GoToSocial developers you've probably seen this going around already, but 0.17.0 of #GoToSocial will be the first release that includes interaction policies, aka reply-controls.

In the first iteration of this feature, you'll be able to configure your account so that new posts created by you will have an interaction policy set on them, which determines whether your instance drops or accepts replies, likes, and boosts of your posts, depending on the visibility of the post, and whether or not an account trying to interact with you is in your followers/following list.

So for example, you will be able to create Public posts that can only be replied to by your followers and people you follow, or unlisted posts that nobody can reply to or like, etc.

GoToSocial interaction policies will be a superset of other reply control proposals created elsewhere (and already implemented by softwares like Pixelfed and Peertube), so your GoToSocial instance should recognize interaction restrictions set not only by other GoToSocial instances, but by Pixelfed and Peertube as well.

If you're interested in reading about how this will work on a protocol level, you can take a look at the documentation here: https://docs.gotosocial.org/en/latest/federation/posts/#interaction-policy

Please note that this feature is not 100% finished yet, and may be subject to change before release. We're aware of where the headaches and difficulties are, so please don't reply to this post griping about them; we already know (and this instance is still running on 0.16.0 so no interaction policies yet).

Thanks for reading :)

 

Original toot:

There are no more open issues in the #ActivityPub issue tracker!

Thanks to all, but mostly to @evan who diligently and tirelessly did much/most/all of the work!!

Onwards!

 

Just a quick thanks. Sometimes I read the threads here having no idea WTF you're all on about and by the end of it come away just that little bit less ignorant. Thank you all for sharing your knowledge and insight.

view more: ‹ prev next ›