Insane graphical installer. You cannot install an os with just serial console access.
We’re using Firefox to render the UI when you’re installing locally. (There’s no Chromium or Electron involved.)
Both are insane.
Insane graphical installer. You cannot install an os with just serial console access.
We’re using Firefox to render the UI when you’re installing locally. (There’s no Chromium or Electron involved.)
Both are insane.
The only thing that is a genuine problem with Linux as a whole is that a lot of apps and games just aren’t compatible
Because two systems are different.
It is not a problem. Shut up and hack.
It can find and load your ssh keys. Does it just do one thing well?
Use plan 9.
Just install plan 9. It is better than anything else.
Yes, the syntax is the same. It also support various GNU and BSD extensions.
GNU bc is unmaintained for years. The latest version is from 2017. It don't have a repo or a mailing list.
bc-gh started in 2018 and it is still actively developed. It is adopted by many projects I've listed in my post.
perhaps they don't care about bc. I think they don't even notice that GNU bc haven't been updated since 2017.
I will change it to "licensing reason". Thank you
But the software you listed are used by many peoples. bc-gh is robust and performant, GNU bc is not actively developed, and benchmark shows that it is clearly slower than bc-gh in most case. But in most distros bc-gh is not available.
But there are technical reason too. IIRC, gcc > 4.3 drop support for some architecture?
~/real ~/real/cprac ~/real/git
Making a LFS distro already show you all the GNU mess! Why another distro?
Oh, I heard you are saying about privacy. The programs you are using have unlimited access to your filesystem if you do not sandbox it.