scratchandgame

joined 1 year ago
[–] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago

OpenBSD is the easiest to use.

[–] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml -3 points 9 months ago

supporting wine is a shame.

[–] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Why don't more distro use LibreSSL? Why don't more distro use mandoc? Why don't more distro use clang?

[–] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Send diff to their lists.

[–] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

The main argument is, the number of Debian's Apparmor policies is not comparable to RHEL's SELinux policies.

[–] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just words of extreme nationalists.

[–] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Encrypted forms are not usable. Uncaught Error: TIMEOUT. I enabled WASM.

[–] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What have you used that’s worked well? Or, could I run Rufus on my linux machine with WINE?

A BLOODY STUPID IDEA!

Using Wine is just stupid enough.

dd is safe. I have used Balena's Etcher 2 years ago but it seems the drive isn't bootable in UEFI mode!

[–] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Also mean more commercial distros. Less donations to BSDs projects.

And it also increase the strength of Apple and Google, do you want to see that?

[–] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It requires any modifications to be under GPL.

And it also requires anything that incorporate GPL codes also be under GPL.

And the code must be published to the copyright holder as far as I know.

How it harms the end user are described.

[–] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

(A)GPL restrict the modification of the software. I'm sharing an example how that restriction works.

view more: ‹ prev next ›