supporting wine is a shame.
scratchandgame
Why don't more distro use LibreSSL? Why don't more distro use mandoc? Why don't more distro use clang?
Send diff to their lists.
The main argument is, the number of Debian's Apparmor policies is not comparable to RHEL's SELinux policies.
Just words of extreme nationalists.
Encrypted forms are not usable. Uncaught Error: TIMEOUT. I enabled WASM.
What have you used that’s worked well? Or, could I run Rufus on my linux machine with WINE?
A BLOODY STUPID IDEA!
Using Wine is just stupid enough.
dd is safe. I have used Balena's Etcher 2 years ago but it seems the drive isn't bootable in UEFI mode!
Also mean more commercial distros. Less donations to BSDs projects.
And it also increase the strength of Apple and Google, do you want to see that?
It requires any modifications to be under GPL.
And it also requires anything that incorporate GPL codes also be under GPL.
And the code must be published to the copyright holder as far as I know.
How it harms the end user are described.
(A)GPL restrict the modification of the software. I'm sharing an example how that restriction works.
Thank you.
OpenBSD is the easiest to use.