The main argument is, the number of Debian's Apparmor policies is not comparable to RHEL's SELinux policies.
scratchandgame
joined 9 months ago
Just words of extreme nationalists.
Encrypted forms are not usable. Uncaught Error: TIMEOUT. I enabled WASM.
What have you used that’s worked well? Or, could I run Rufus on my linux machine with WINE?
A BLOODY STUPID IDEA!
Using Wine is just stupid enough.
dd is safe. I have used Balena's Etcher 2 years ago but it seems the drive isn't bootable in UEFI mode!
Also mean more commercial distros. Less donations to BSDs projects.
And it also increase the strength of Apple and Google, do you want to see that?
It requires any modifications to be under GPL.
And it also requires anything that incorporate GPL codes also be under GPL.
And the code must be published to the copyright holder as far as I know.
How it harms the end user are described.
(A)GPL restrict the modification of the software. I'm sharing an example how that restriction works.
Thank you.
Congratulations for not being in any team!
I've written more clearly that you must be a writer to join team 1 or 2. Keep going on your project, and ignore those who are fanatical and like to meddle in other people's affairs, like the guys who want a project to refuse donations and contributions from some specific or all company.
Thanks.
Open source software has its source code published. It doesn’t necessarily mean that you’re able to copy some or all of it, modify it, distribute it, etc.
GPL as an example.
Free software can be freely copied, modified, distributed, etc
If you are citing the GNU's website, you should remove the "modified". I'd quote a mailing list user:
Say if OpenSSH was licenced under (A)GPL, companies would likely not use it because they wouldn't be able to incorporate it into their IP, they would then try to code a shoddy implementation, and have numerous security bugs which would affect the end user. In other words, you are just shooting yourself in the foot.
pushing for a move from “Free” to “Open Source.”
Can you explain more? Is that related to the clown gpl guys criticizing BSD/MIT/ISC license and laugh on FreeBSD for letting Apple to do whatever I can't remember?
Send diff to their lists.