scratchandgame

joined 2 years ago
[–] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

OpenBSD is the easiest to use.

[–] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 years ago

supporting wine is a shame.

[–] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Why don't more distro use LibreSSL? Why don't more distro use mandoc? Why don't more distro use clang?

[–] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Send diff to their lists.

[–] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

The main argument is, the number of Debian's Apparmor policies is not comparable to RHEL's SELinux policies.

[–] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Just words of extreme nationalists.

[–] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Encrypted forms are not usable. Uncaught Error: TIMEOUT. I enabled WASM.

[–] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What have you used that’s worked well? Or, could I run Rufus on my linux machine with WINE?

A BLOODY STUPID IDEA!

Using Wine is just stupid enough.

dd is safe. I have used Balena's Etcher 2 years ago but it seems the drive isn't bootable in UEFI mode!

[–] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Also mean more commercial distros. Less donations to BSDs projects.

And it also increase the strength of Apple and Google, do you want to see that?

[–] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It requires any modifications to be under GPL.

And it also requires anything that incorporate GPL codes also be under GPL.

And the code must be published to the copyright holder as far as I know.

How it harms the end user are described.

[–] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

(A)GPL restrict the modification of the software. I'm sharing an example how that restriction works.

view more: ‹ prev next ›