skulblaka

joined 1 year ago
[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 11 points 21 hours ago

In a past life, pretty plausible.

Now that Elmo is the First Lady, this is the best TOS that's ever been written by anyone ever. It's perfect. It probably trumps the constitution because of how perfect it is.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You're supposed to be celebrating the more widespread adoption of federated software and a break away from centrally controlled corpo environments in general. This is the public retaking the internet for themselves.

If you don't like the particular content, cool, don't go there. I don't go on Mastodon either but I can appreciate why it's there.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 days ago

Man, I managed to completely forget about that. My dad was really, really into that game. Like, that's about all he did for most of 4 years and ended up leaving my mom for someone he met in game.

I guess SL wasn't really any worse about that than any other game, plenty of people meet and get married in MMOs, but I think the raging custom-content sex parties in SL probably didn't help matters at the time.

Wonder how that game is doing these days. Cursory web search says it's still alive. I probably would have found it to be pretty interesting if I wasn't so turned away from it by my family experience.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

On machines that were actually strong enough to run it, it was mostly fine. I played on PC and while I admit the later balancing update was probably necessary, I didn't run into most of the real nasty bugs people liked to talk about. I had a great time putting in 100 or so hours in version 1.

A solid 80% or more of all the problems Cyberpunk had at launch stemmed from trying to launch it on last-gen consoles. It absolutely was not intended for PS4 or XB1 and targeting those platforms was a mistake. Once they pulled availability for those and buckled down on getting it prettied up for next gen, the quality jumped by a mile within the next year and a half of updates.

The launch was rough, I grant you that, and maybe I'm just simping for CDPR but even at the time I was in the vocal minority saying, hey this game really isn't that bad if you give it a chance and run it on hardware that it was intended for.

And of course now with its updates and DLC it's just genuinely a great game.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

I don't know about the rest of them, but Ben Franklin sure envisioned some orgies. Attended a few of 'em too.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just because EA claims something is an expansion on the box, does not make it true.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You could ask the same thing of Wizards of the Coast who sent goons to a guy's house over some Magic The Gathering cards.

We live in an age where these two things are becoming interchangeable.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

How is it that you, me, everybody, everybody's cousin, and also the FBI were all fully aware that Trump & Co were guaranteed going to try and cheat the election, and yet the first moment all the republican electors come out and say "Yep Trump wins!! We promise!!" everyone is just accepting this as fact?

I have severe doubts about the validity of these numbers for at least the next several weeks. Republicans have proven repeatedly that they are not going to play fair in any fashion. I don't believe a damn thing they tell me without receipts for it and we've got until January to produce the receipts.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You're giving them money and engagement with which to continue. Having your eyes on that content and then returning the next day to see more is explicit approval of that content. And having those ads served to you makes Elon money which he then uses to serve more ads to everyone.

Essentially, visiting X is paying Elon real dollars directly and telling him thank you for the propaganda, may I please have another

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

Genuinely curious how long you could continue getting people to sink advertising dollars into the bot playground. If he played it smart I bet he could get a solid decade or so of people paying to show ads to AIs without telling them all the people are gone. Maybe longer, if he's really smart and actually tells them for real that there's no people in there but that their marketing materials will be incorporated into the AI in/output.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Sure would be a shame if someone pointed a big fuck-off electromagnet in that direction eh

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Because when you get pissed off at one shitty video and click off it to find a better one, that's free real estate in which to double your ads.

And what are you gonna do? Go to Peertube? YouTube is too gigantic to have a real competitor no matter how much we try. It is a beast so massive and bloated at this point that we just can't kill it without legislative interference. And Google knows damn well that they're basically the only game in town so they aren't afraid of significant user backlash.

view more: next ›