spectrums_coherence

joined 1 month ago
[–] spectrums_coherence@piefed.social 17 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Elon is building both the "apocalypse-proof" (they are not) truck and the apocalypse (he really is)

[–] spectrums_coherence@piefed.social 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I should specify I am referring to mainland China. Hong Kong has a different health care systems, and the health care is usually considered reasonably affordable for residents (could be because people in Hong Kong are generally more wealthy than most of mainland China)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthcare_in_Hong_Kong

I want to add China's healthcare is still reasonably affordable for many people living and working in cities.

[–] spectrums_coherence@piefed.social 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

No they don't. They have state provided health care, supplemented with private options.

But they are not universal in the sense that (1) not the entire population is covered (although almost everyone is) (2) health care is not close to free for most people.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_health_care_by_country#China

There is literally a hit movie couple years ago about the difficulty to obtain affordable Imatinib: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dying_to_Survive

(Imatinib was later covered by state health care package because of this movie

I feel if everything they said is true, then this is a reasonable solution. But from my many Youtube scammer video experience, like people have already mentioned, most scammers use standard remote access software, not some bespoke APK.

Why have we been talking about EU chat control for years. How many time have this been voted on? and can people just keep popping up chat control if the previous one fail?