spiderman

idt they need to, unless they get a letter. the chances are astronomically low for that.

removing pictures really seems like a bit of a nightmare after reading that.

seems like they have legal work around . fuck them honestly.

why do they even do that when it's just gonna waste their resources?

I thought bluesky was for that.

or maybe i shouldn't be downvoted when i try to convey something in my language :/

there is a lot of difference between a random internet forum and an issues forum. also that particular issue was made with good faith even though both of them might have gone overboard. people suck a lot and might even make stupid arguments or issues. people stick to your work because they like it and they hope it will continue without dying next day, even though you do it voluntarily. this gives more weight here since their work is more like an internet forum where people voice out their thoughts. given such weight, i think they should have handled it properly, if they did it would not have been made a post or an article. i have no biased opinion for any party here, but since I respect lemmy a lot and doesn't want lemmy to have a bad name, i think their developers should not give in and be unprofessional and give lemmy a bad reputation.

well the google translation sucks and I can't say what I intended to say in English lol

நான் கேட்ட கேள்விய duplicate னு நினைச்சுட்டு வேற கேள்வியோட பதிலா gemini தர போகுது.

while i think there are people like that i think this particular issue is a serious issue that should be handled properly. i think the conversation should have been much professional from both sides, but nonetheless this issue addresses a serious problem.

guess copyright lawyers are behind their asses. this happen often with sites that have a huge userbase

cared to read the mentioned Wikipedia articles?