spudwart

joined 1 year ago
[–] spudwart@spudwart.com 20 points 10 months ago

This is a band-aid solution to a problem caused by a larger issue.

Since in the US driving is an implied requirement for transportation, the barrier to entry for driving a car is absurdly low.

This is a bad solution to a bad problem caused by decades of bad decisions.

[–] spudwart@spudwart.com 11 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Yes, except If cake were free and accessible to anyone regardless of silverware or plates.

[–] spudwart@spudwart.com 20 points 10 months ago (14 children)
[–] spudwart@spudwart.com 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What’s happening July 1st?

[–] spudwart@spudwart.com 1 points 11 months ago

Now it's time for the xXx_Hyperloop_xXx, which will definitely, 100%, pinky promise, we swear, fix traffic congestion.

[–] spudwart@spudwart.com 2 points 11 months ago

Communities moderated by Morals rather than Profit will always be better.

[–] spudwart@spudwart.com 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I mean it will help Lemmy. But It certainly will result in more EEE attempts on the fediverse.

[–] spudwart@spudwart.com 5 points 11 months ago

Falling short of growth means their going to take aggressive action.

This is typical traded-company bullshit. You have to reach quarterly projections. Even if you're in the black, if you don't reach the projection the shareholders will react accordingly.

So, to avoid missing their next quarter, they will enshittify to meet shareholder demands. And it may work, for a while. But it will continually drain their userbase to nothing.

[–] spudwart@spudwart.com 34 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

This will trigger an enshittification cycle.

    1. Underperformance per-quarter resulting in anti-user actions to increase profits.
    1. Users leave because of anti-user actions.
    1. Profits will decrease as users leave until the end of quarter.
    1. Return to Step 1.
[–] spudwart@spudwart.com 30 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I understand the issue of “it’s a Fediverse only if the network is diversified.” And “it’s difficult for new users to understand.” But if we also go down the path of making the system like a standard centralized network we defeat the purpose of the Fediverse.

Our issue isn’t a “we need to copycat our predecessors” it’s a “we need to explain how we work in a simple enough way no one could possibly misunderstand.”

I’ve tried various methods of explaining it, and I think the issue is half bad explanations and half a lack of interest.

We need to also start pressing our strengths. The Fediverse, as it’s nature of an AGPLv3 project, is ad free. We also don’t have the weight of megacorps deciding what is allowed to be shared because of said ad revenue.

Avoid talking about the technology. Boast our numbers, we’re 2 million strong on Lemmy and 14 million Fediverse wide. Avoid confusion, offer help, and press our advantages.

[–] spudwart@spudwart.com 2 points 11 months ago

“Hey Luigi! Bowl of Spaghetti?!”

“Just spaghetti on the rocks.”

view more: ‹ prev next ›