sudo

joined 1 year ago
[–] sudo@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah they're hyper conservative religious zealots. I have many criticisms of them. Islamic state is far far worse though. Can you at least recognize that the Islamic State is worse?

[–] sudo@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

I never said they didn't arm them. I explicitly stated multiple times that we agreed on this front. All I stated is that the only islamists doing terrorism are the wahhabists and then you're like "ah BUT did you consider that the CIA funded those terrorists???" as though that disproves anything I said.

You tried to frame what should've been an "yes AND" as some disagreement. There is no disagreement.

[–] sudo@programming.dev 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

All I'm doing is pointing out the a the Islamic State is strictly worse than the Taliban and its good that the Taliban are fighting them. I'd prefer it'd be someone other than the Taliban but that doesn't change the facts.

[–] sudo@programming.dev 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Making fun of the Taliban for joining forces against the Islamic State, the terrorists from the meme is defending them.

[–] sudo@programming.dev 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The Islamic State are the ones suicide bombing Hazari women at the moment not the Taliban.

[–] sudo@programming.dev -2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

And are you simping for the Islamic State?

[–] sudo@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I think we're done here after that embarrassing tantrum.

[–] sudo@programming.dev 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

No. And no patience for the semantic argument you're wasting my time with when we both agree on the material reality

[–] sudo@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

I said "Islamic terrorism is almost exclusively the domain of wahhabi's" and you're argueing, "what if the CIA funded the wahhabi's?" as though that contradicts my point.

I don't know what the disagreement is. Its always the wahhabi's executing the actual terrorism. If you want to lump in their sponsors, like is said, "go off". But you're framing it like I'm ignorant of that which I'm not.

[–] sudo@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Pull your head out of your ass. Assaulting protestors is something every government does, legitimate or not. How many countries can you name that haven't assaulted protestors? Even Jefferson's "watering the tree of liberty" quote is about murdering protestors.

Now if you actually read into the article you posted, the Hazari women were protesting the Taliban's lack of response to an actual terrorist suicide bombing by ISKP. The Islamic State has been aggressively massacring Hazari's ever since the US left. That said, its not like the Taliban are the friends of Hazari's, they just aren't massacring them.

[–] sudo@programming.dev -1 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I specified "Islamic terrorists" for a reason but go off.

[–] sudo@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Ripits are only for butt chugging

Agreed, but they are the official energy drink of the US Army. I'm sure more than one private had boofed a ripit. Sorry you didn't get a Charger. You would've love it.

view more: ‹ prev next ›