tanja

joined 1 year ago
[–] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Wake up babe, new bottom surgery just dropped

[–] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 months ago

So you'd need an account in all of these networks?

And how would cross-posting work?

[–] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 7 months ago

AT does have some advantages, but I strongly prefer the whole philosophy behind AP.

And yes, bsky doesn't really inspire me with confidence.

[–] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Neither is good

[–] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 151 points 7 months ago (24 children)

Nice

Good to see one of the two big packaging hubs do something against malware

[–] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Removing /repo is not considered safe, but I just removed its contents anyways and then just ran a repair.

That actually resulted in more available disk space than after running the garbage collection.

And my flatpak apps still work 🤷‍♀️

 

So I've recently taken an interest in these three distros:

All of these offer something very interesting:
Access to (basically) all Linux-capable software, no matter from what repo.

Both NixOS and blendOS are based on config files, from which your system is basically derived from, and Vanilla OS uses a package manager apx to install from any given repo, regardless of distribution.

While I've looked into Fedora Silverblue, that distro is limited to only install Flatpaks (edit: no, not really), which is fine for "apps", but seems to be more of a problem with managing system- and CLI tools.

I haven't distro hopped yet, as I'm still on Manjaro GNOME on my devices.


What are your thoughts on the three distros mentioned above?
Which ones are the most interesting, and for what reasons?

Personally, I'm mostly interested in NixOS & blendOS, as I believe they may have more advantages compared to Arch;

What do you think?