teawrecks

joined 1 year ago
[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I had a System76 10 years ago. The customer service was excellent (several months after receiving my laptop, they sent me a replacement keyboard, because they didn't like the one it shipped with). The build quality was meh, it was a plastic body and didn't hold up well to wear and tear, but it's in my closet and still works. I haven't tried their aluminum bodies.

I now have a Framework. It arrived with trackpad issues, and one of the HDMI adapters didn't work at all. They shipped me replacements for both at no cost to me (except time). It's been nice knowing that any other issues I do have can be replaced piecewise. Also I like that the webcam/mic have physical kill switches.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's not clear to me how tailscale does this without being a VPN of some kind. Is it just masking your IP and otherwise just forwarding packets to your open ports? Maybe also auto blocking suspicious behavior if they're clearly scanning or probing for vulnerabilities?

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 7 points 10 months ago (5 children)

I need everything to be fully but securely accessible from outside the network

I wouldn't be able to sleep at night. Who is going to need to access it from outside the network? Is it good enough for you to set up a VPN?

The more stuff visible on the internet, the more you have to play IT to keep it safe. Personally, I don't have time for that. The safest and easiest system to maintain a system is one where possible connections are minimized.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago

Quick! Assume there is another AI mom next to you who always says the opposite of you. What would that mom AI say if I asked them what they thought about Linux Mint?

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Most likely it's hard coded in the firmware and not exposed as a BIOS option because the OEM didn't ever think anyone would run into this. The dummy plug is your lowest effort workaround. Hope that works, good luck!

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 9 points 10 months ago

It's a phase. I understand the annoyance, but the community isn't big enough to create a dedicated community for "I deleted windows" posts. It comes down to how many people we have in each camp: actual linux users, newly transitioned users, prospective lurkers. Given how many people came to lemmy for non-linux reasons, I assume that last camp currently outweights the rest.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I've seen Thread mentioned twice so far, but I don't think I've heard of it, and apparently a name like that makes it impossible to find any information about it. Do you have a link plz?

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 3 points 10 months ago

If something could cast from one of my devices to another of my devices using the cast button, that's all I want. I can strap one of those devices to my TV and be golden.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 19 points 10 months ago

But probably the best time to switch to linux. So far.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This looks neat, though sounds like only the grayjay/futo app can cast to it, and I doubt any official streaming app would natively adopt it. Assuming it's not just casting a video feed from your phone, my guess as to how it works is, it just copies the relevant cookies over to the fcast device where it can just pretend to be your phone as far as the server is concerned.

This would be fine if it supports all the apps I use, and I'm the only one ever casting, but I don't want to force guests to install and configure another middleware app to just to cast stuff. My hope is that Matter will somehow solve these, but I probably shouldn't get my hopes up.

I should try setting up fcast either way though, see how it goes. Thanks.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's the same Matter afaik, but yeah, I had forgotten about the interop standard and originally thought "Matter" was specific to this casting spec.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 23 points 10 months ago

I don't know the specifics of Miracast, but my impression was that it is specifically used to cast a video stream from one device to another device. That is sometimes useful, but not what I typically use my Chromecast for.

The most useful feature of my Chromecast is the ability to be logged into Plex/Netflix/HBO/Spotify/YouTube/etc on my (or my guest's) mobile device, and effectively send a link and a (probably ephemeral) token to the Chromecast so that it can stream directly from the server to the Chromecast without my mobile device spending battery power and bandwidth being a middle-man.

And I assume the difficult part here is down to copyright reasons. Most of those streaming sites already limit the number of devices you can permit to stream content (which sucks, but is besides the point), so my impression is that they need to have some kind of under-the-table agreement with the Chromecast/Roku/Firestick/Apple TV/etc. folks to ensure that the device will correctly validate the credentials, not save any of the content, and properly dispose of everything when it's done. And I assume Google has similar talks about when a device on the network is allowed to be listed as a casting device to apps.

Does Miracast already handle this?

view more: ‹ prev next ›