the_post_of_tom_joad

joined 1 year ago
[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Probably try reading the missive before commenting cuz your take is catastrophically wrong and bad

Memes all the way down

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

One of the worst abuses of stereo in my opinion are old Beatles albums. Maybe cuz the tech was somewhat new they were playing far too much? Too much for me anyway

Winnin piracy just like they winnin the war on drugs

Uh oh didn't you read whyesseffs rant yesterday you rascal? She coming for ya

I couldn't find what you meant. Can you expand a bit?

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@hexbear.net 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

IANAL but i am wondering if Disney is somehow letting this case go as a backdoor way to legitimize arbitration agreements.

Like, i just can't see Disney not knowing this is the wrong case to push the legitimacy of an arbitration agreement. But if this case somehow legitimized through whachacallit... precedent... that an arbitration agreement, while binding in a primary sense, is not binding for every Disney product, wouldn't Disney (and really every company that uses binding arbitration as part of using their product) consider that a win?

Because as i understand it, arbitration agreements as a requirement to use a service is still an untested legal grey area. Anything legitimizing them at all would be a win... Right? Againn ianal

On the other hand if there's gonna be a challenge to the legality of arbitration agreements this is a strong place to start from.

Damn, i had no idea she was this off her rocker.

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@hexbear.net 29 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (11 children)

I dig their cracks but i don't follow the drama. Care to offer a primer on the soap opera?

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@hexbear.net 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Wheres civility when you need them? Civility where are you?

view more: next ›