toothbrush

joined 1 year ago
[–] toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I recommentd ext4. Its extremely stable and easy to manage. Btrfs, zfs etc. is overkill for a pure data drive imo.

[–] toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 53 points 7 months ago (2 children)

This guy sounds like he snorted every 60s-70s sci fi at once and now his goal in life is creating the torment nexus. I had no idea that the CEO of Y Combinator(hacker news?) had "friends" like this?

[–] toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 months ago

I use Moonlight & Sunshine for streaming. It works really well, but it needs a lot of bandwith when you stream to more than one person.

[–] toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

yeah, the compose key is already standard, just rebind a key to the compose key and it should work.

[–] toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 7 months ago

I am sceptical of the idea. If every post had a specific license, it would be a minefield to federate or host, because every post could potentially forbid sharing it, or have other stipulations.

Most posts and comments are not copyrightable anyway. A few sentences are not enough to count as a "creative work". It would need to be your entire posting history, and even then its dubious if that counts as one work.

I propose instead that we do it like wikipedia and others, and that the server as a whole has a license.

[–] toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

paywalled :/

[–] toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 8 months ago

I think they are great. Yes, they are a little expensive, but I am really happy with mine, and I've heard only good things about the Stellaris from a friend who owns one.

[–] toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 9 months ago

Damn it. That would have been a strong blow against openai's agressive monetisation if it was a legitimate lawsuit.

[–] toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

yeah, I wrote a "conspiracy theory" of sorts as a comment a few months ago about that as the situation developed. Turns out it was true, microsoft used OpenAI's CEO to remove critical board members, so they get control over the non-profit part of the company that controls the patents/software.

[–] toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 months ago

I think it will be released pre-trained if they are forced to make it open source, otherwise they are not actually releasing chatgpt/dall-e, just the underlying technology they used to make it. No idea however if musks lawyers know that.

[–] toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

it wouldnt be useless, most "open source" models work like this. But yeah, having access to the dataset is very important, and in my opinion open source licenses requires its inclusion. However, no legal battles have been fought over that fact yet...

[–] toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

He wasnt that charismatic. Microsoft offered everyone at openai a spot in their top ai division if they signed that letter, with all the employee benefits and clout that microsoft employment can offer. Of course they signed it!

view more: ‹ prev next ›