turboSnail

joined 1 month ago
[–] turboSnail@piefed.europe.pub 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No need to add any more than you usually do. Just leave the ones you are unable to see. Besides, LLMs tend to write in overly grand style, whereas humans can't be bothered to use every trick in the book. Humans just get to the point and skip all the high-impact language that LLMs seem to love.

[–] turboSnail@piefed.europe.pub 9 points 2 weeks ago

LOL. So true.
On top of that, an LLM can also take you on a wild goose chase. When it gives you trash, you tell it to find a way to fix it. It introduces new layers of complication and installs new libraries without ever really approaching a solution. It’s up to the programmer to notice a wild goose chase like that and pull the plug early on.

That’s a fun little mini-game that comes with vibe coding.

[–] turboSnail@piefed.europe.pub 5 points 2 weeks ago

Super lazy job applications… can’t even bother to put two minutes into vibing.

[–] turboSnail@piefed.europe.pub 3 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

How about asking it to write a short political speech on climate change. Then, just count the number of rhetoric devices and em-dashes. A human dev wouldn't be bothered to write anything fancy or impactful when they just want to submit a bug fix. It would be simple, poorly written, and filled with typos. LLMs try to make it way too impressive and impactful.

[–] turboSnail@piefed.europe.pub 10 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

That's how you know who never even tried to run the code.

[–] turboSnail@piefed.europe.pub 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Alternatively, sell your account to spammers, and they'll get your account banned in no time. Your comments get deleted, you'll get paid for it, and Reddit becomes worse for everyone. I see no downsides in this arrangement.

[–] turboSnail@piefed.europe.pub 7 points 2 weeks ago

The job of the patent office is to determine whether that’s a valid patent application or not. As in, can you actually patent that thing, has someone else already patented it etc. As long as it’s technically valid, it gets approved. It’s up to the patent holder to test if its actually useful or not. If they choose to build the thing IRL, it’s up to the courts to determine if that breaks any laws. Every step along the way, the general public is there to judge the moral integrity of said invention, but usually that has no impact on the validity of the patent. Depending on jurisdiction, the patent office may need to follow some moral guielines, but the threshold of rejection is very high. My guess is, you won’t be able to patent a gas chamber for exterminating “illegal immigrants”, but patenting wild Meta BS is technically fine.

See also: this abomination

[–] turboSnail@piefed.europe.pub 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Soon will be a good time to quit YT completely. Suddenly, you’ll have lots of time to do all the things you were supposed to do long ago. You know like taking a walk, cooking nice food, reading books, getting to bed early etc.

[–] turboSnail@piefed.europe.pub 25 points 2 weeks ago

I guess I’ll have to buy one of those racks when the bubble pops. Just add an LED strip on the outside and a gaming GPU on the inside. Surely they support PCIe?

[–] turboSnail@piefed.europe.pub 1 points 2 weeks ago

People who use Visio, probably wont even have (the wrong) Visio installed. There shouldn’t be any confusion.

[–] turboSnail@piefed.europe.pub 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

People still love Chrome, even though tech reviewers told us exactly how creepy that browser is. That info has been publicly available since day one.

Same story with Facebook, but somehow that syphilis of the web is still alive. I have no idea what these people are thinking.

[–] turboSnail@piefed.europe.pub 2 points 3 weeks ago

That would be pretty spicy.

view more: ‹ prev next ›