turkalino

Netflix is doing great

uses picture from the worst major studio movie of 2023

You are one ugly pangolinfucker

"Massive" maybe meaning population or impact, about 1/3 of CA's population is in that region

It would be as practical for good actors to simply state an image is generated in its caption, citation, or some other preexisting method. Good actors will retransmit this information, while bad actors will omit it, just like they’d remove the watermark. At least this way, no special software is required for the average person to check if an image is generated.

Bing Image Creator already implements watermarks but it is trivially easy for me to download an image I generated, remove the watermark, and proceed with my ruining of democracy /s

Kids: press switch to front-facing camera button anyways

Quick, everybody say AI could do their job so that the corporate airheads invest a bunch of money in AI, get sad when it doesn't deliver, and then become super pessimistic about AI

Only gonna make things more difficult for good actors while doing absolutely nothing to bad actors

Hmm, I wonder what he greased these slopes with... butter? Lard? Margarine?

I've only used the Bing implementation of Dalle3, which one lets you upload a photo?

Coming to Antarctica

Everyone keeps pointing the fingers at ad blockers, but it's general enshitification. A website which does nothing more than display some thumbnails, some text comments, and a video should not work as poorly as YouTube does. And yet, they are so many layers of recommendation engines deep that blackbox AIs have more control over the website than actual humans, and more CPU cycles are spent guessing what I want to watch than loading what I am currently watching. I have the most expensive consumer GPU that AMD makes and I still regularly see graphical glitches on YouTube

Real Headline: "Billionaire who Previously Led Massive Failure Wants AI to take 90% of Movie Production Jobs so that he can Have More Money to Spend on Massive Failures"