Anytime I see an anti-mozilla article, it’s abundantly clear that it’s an astroturfing campaign to make Firefox look bad. You NEVER see these articles about chrome, brave, opera, etc which are all much much worse.
tyler
joined 2 years ago
Please do explain or link sources to what you think are “security holes”.
lol read a few comments down.
Yes that’s exactly why adblockers will always be legal. You cannot be forced to run spyware on your own computer systems (unless the law changes which it might).
Keep digging your hole. Until you give a reason you’re just a troll.
Oh look, that rhymed. My comment has more value than anything you’ve said so far.
Edit: oh look the troll is now private messaging and abusing even more. 
So you have no reason and are claiming it’s consumerism. There’s no physical product. It’s not consumerism. You’re just a troll and a fucking moron too.
Obvious troll is obvious. If you weren’t a troll you’d give a reason.
No you’re most likely talking about computer access, not piracy. And please do link the ones you’re talking about.
It’s not piracy in any way shape or form. If they sent the document to your computer then you have the document, reading that document and saving it elsewhere are not crimes and never can be, because the only way the Internet works is by transmitting the document to you where your computer must store it in some way.
Aside from most of those being “potential issues”, which weren’t proven, the rest are GETs of things that do not need to be secret, things like album art and list of installed plugins. Besides the one plugin issue, which was an actual security issue, which was fixed over a year and a half ago. https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/pull/11436
Contrast that with Plex which has numerous high severity CVEs that include things like remote code execution, directory traversal, and more.