I have two quotes. One from the OP article and the second from the article you linked.
tyler
joined 1 year ago
uh. that article has less information? Unless you're seeing something I don't. My comment literally has more information about the satellite than the futurism article.
Can you please link that law?
The roughly 10-centimetre-long cube is made of magnolia-wood panels and has an aluminium frame, solar panels, circuit boards and sensors. The panels incorporate Japanese wood-joinery methods that do not rely on glue or metal fittings.
When LignoSat plunges back to Earth, after six months to a year of service, the magnolia will incinerate completely and release only water vapour and carbon dioxide
Huh? I’m confused.
Pretty sure they said the exact opposite of that. Judging by every one of your responses in this thread you seriously need to practice your reading comprehension.
No, the contract and ToS for the uncontract says it’s the same price guarantee as the price-lock. It says so in the article.
Did you generate this with chat gpt? And that’s not being a patent troll. A patent troll is specifically a company that buys up patents, that they do not intend to use and never do, and then sue for them. E.g. a company that does nothing, produces no value, and simply takes others to court for what they own.
They show it working on iPhone.
Sad to see an i5 in that condition :(
Accurate
That’s not a single pop up though. Go look at patch notes for any iOS release. There will be upwards of a hundred items. You want a pop up for each and every one of those? And then that has to get programmed for, bug tested, and that’s just going to increase costs. Or people could just read the release notes and none of that has to happen.
Just in case you don’t actually know, it’s Looks Good To Me. It’s very commonly used when software devs review each other’s code.