underwire212

joined 1 year ago
[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can’t wait till AI can just learn and utilize my consciousness on my behalf. That way I don’t need to exist.

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 29 points 1 month ago

He works at the knife factory

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

WhatsApp? Isn’t that just like, a messenger? Would think you’d want better friends if you’re encountering hate speech in your group chats haha

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

We define people by their labor value in capitalist societies. It only makes sense headlines would refer to people thru the lens of their previous employer.

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 100 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Basically, AT&T argues against it saying it’ll force them to innovate and be competitive with other services.

Won’t anyone think of the poor telecom shareholders??

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 19 points 2 months ago

My fragile masculinity 😔

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

Soooooo VPN?

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean, it’s not really a false dichotomy though? Your statements suggest that we assign fault/root cause to the consumer. I’m suggesting we assign root cause to the manufacturer/lack of regulation. If at the end of the day, it’s the consumer’s fault they chose a product without conducting a comprehensive quality review of all components within the product they purchase, then the action of pushing government regulation contradicts that. Funding regulation doesn’t do anything to fix consumer behavior; i.e. root cause. But maybe I misinterpreted your statements.

As for your first statement, there are many problems with this reasoning. How can we reasonably expect consumers to perform comprehensive research studies on everything they purchase? If it turned out the specific manufacturer of Grade B wool that’s used for a certain sweater from a certain clothing brand is known for causing latent forms of cancer if worn for 2 years, that’s really on the consumer? C’mon now.

Besides, in this specific case, it turned out to be a catastrophic latent failure. It wasn’t even possible for an informed consumer to have predicted this sort of catastrophic failure.

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

By that rationale, we should be blaming those who picked a certain brand of hamburger meat for getting salmonella poisoning? I would think we’d want to push responsibility on the corporation and governmental oversight for change in food safety standards than mock those who got sick.

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 14 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Ehh…iOS is arguably the most secure mobile operating system (excluding something like GrapheneOS) currently on the market.

I don’t give a shit what brand you use, because I don’t have brand loyalty, but I can see valid reasons for why someone might want to use Apple Macbooks. Shitting on the consumer here does no good. All consumers deserve the same amount of consumer protection, regardless of which tech overlord they happen to purchase their hardware from.

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Eh…you can pick any two examples and show anything really.

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

I know seriously lmao. I mean I know it’s anecdotal, but I’m in the US and my friends and I constantly criticize the US. Most people I know tend to agree with most criticisms, myself included.

view more: ‹ prev next ›