unknowing8343

joined 1 year ago
[โ€“] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

One of the reasons surely is that it's getting banned from government software ๐Ÿ˜…

[โ€“] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Or you can preinstall micro like you preinstall everything else ๐Ÿ˜…

And all the shortcuts are SANE, not the weird thing of nano

[โ€“] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 2 months ago (9 children)

In every post of this kind I am amazed at so many people using nano instead of micro which is SO MUCH BETTER while being the same thing at the same time.

[โ€“] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm afraid to tell you that your e-book deDRMing is very much considered piracy. ๐Ÿ˜…

[โ€“] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Piracy is easier than ever IMO. 20 years ago it was messy, and full of viruses and fake content. Nowadays there's plug&play pirate services with refined content.

There's so much people in the world today convinced that their subscriptions are worth it that I think they'll let pirates coexist in peace, because they know pirates wouldn't pay for it anyways.

[โ€“] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I am a fan of Python's or Rust's official conventions.

For package names, tho, I don't get why this-is-used over this_clearly_better_system, as I would expect a double click to select_the_whole_thing, whereas it does-not-happen-here.

[โ€“] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It is a project! All games are, ๐Ÿ˜…, just follow the instructions from the README. You'll be solving Rust exercises on your preferred editor, and get some feedback from a terminal window. It's great.

[โ€“] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The thing is that, in C the API could be slightly different and you could get terrible crashes, for example because certain variables were freed at different times, etc.

In Rust that is literally impossible to happen unless you (very extremely rarely) need to do something unsafe, which is explicitly marked as such and will never surprise you with an unexpected crash.

Everything is so strongly typed that if it compiles... It will run without unexpected crashes. That's the difference with C code, and that's why Rust is said to be safe. Memory leaks, etc, are virtually impossible.

[โ€“] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (11 children)

Everything is better in Rust. Faster, safer... And also the developer experience is amazing with cargo.

The problem here is not Rust, it's the humans, it seems.

The dependencies are set manually, of course, and the dev was enforcing something too strict, it seems, and that is causing headaches.

But, as the debian dude has learned... Rust programs will 99.999 % work if they can be compiled.

[โ€“] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I just wish every programmer completed the rustlings game/tutorial. Doesn't take that long.

I didn't even fully complete it, and it made me a way better programmer, because it forces you to think RIGHT.

It may sound weird for people who haven't experienced it, but it's amazing when you get angry at the compiler and you realise... It is right, and you were doing something that could f*ck you up 2 months in the future.

And after a bit of practise, it starts wiring your brain differently, and now my Python code looks so much better and it's way more safe just because of those days playing around in rustlings.

So yeah, Rust is an amazing language for everything, but particularly for kernel development. Either Linux implements it, or it'll probably die in 30 years and get replaced with a modern Rust kernel (Redox OS?).

[โ€“] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So my mom shouldn't use GNU/Linux because she can't fix bugs?

view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ