all the advertised AI detection tools are just that. Happy slapping!
vrighter
This is not error correction issue though. Error correction means taking known data and adding redundancy to it so that damaed pieces can be repaired. This makes the message longer.
An llm's output does not contain error correction. It's just the output. And it doesn't contain any errors, mathematically speaking. The hallucination is the correct output. It is what the statistics it gathered from its training set determined is most likely. A "correct" llm output is indistinguishable from a "hallucination", mathematically, and always will be. A hallucination is simply "some output that some human, somewhere, doesn't like", and that's uncomputable. And outputs that people subjectively consider as "hallucinations" cannot be eliminated, because an llm is, fundamentally, a probabilistic algorithm. If you added error correction to an llm's output all you'd be able to recover is the llm's original output, "hallucinations" and all.
Tldr: "hallucinations" are a subjective thing. A Hallucination" is not an error that can be corrected after-the-fact, because it is not an error in the first place.
they would need to develop balanced mechanics. Level scaling completely ruins any sense of progression.
they didn't. This is about a properly written headline by BBC being butchered when summarized by apple intelligence, which they have no control over.
the problems with (the current forms of generative) AI will not be solved, because they cannot be solved. They are intrinsic to the whole framework.
5G hadn't been invented yet. They had nothing to worry about back then.
/s
llm and search should not be in the same sentence
telegram is one of the worst, privacy wise.
american, right? It's very popular in other places.
deus ex... thief...
multiplayer.
It doesn't add up
and the bar is getting lower. Fast iteration, releasing broken, poorly understood, barely maintainable pieces of shit as quickly as one can.
Fucking agile
9% played 2024 games in 2023?