there's lots of handwavy things. They even said they "discovered new physics" to explain some disappointing (perfectly predictable, by other established nuclear physicists) results. "Oh the physics equation was wrong, we just need to make everything 25% bigger".
Also, the emitted radiation levels will be insane once it's scaled up
the ones that give up on all the "desirable" aspects of cryptocurrencies? The payment isn't final until it is on chain. You don't need to trust anyone to figure out if you're on the right chain in the first place. Off-chain shit defeats this. What's the point, other than dressing up the horse before beating it some more?
for example? Because your statement is similar to asking a chef what's on the menu and them replying with "food"
not with LLMs, definitely
when you flood the internet with content you don't want, but can't detect, that is quite difficult
and if that doesn't work, try a nuke
subtitles have completely stopped working for me :/
except that they regularly do. It isn't even news at this point
but that's not what they're doing when they're spitting out open source code verbatim, with no attribution or license
well yeah. And it has been proven time and again that they can, and do, regurgitate that training material out quite often
if i learn a book by heart, and then go around making money by reciting it, then that's illegal. same thing.
very stupid. One of the most difficult things in space is cooling stuff. Sending up a bunch of space heaters in a box (almost all of the energy pumped into a computer is turned into heat. The actual computatiion takes next to nothing in comparison) is definitely not a good idea. Definitely not one thought up by a technical person.